Romney slams Obama for lecturing Israel

(Carl)The Republican presidential candidate also slammed Obama, alleging without mentioning specifics, that officials in his administration had leaked details of American cyber-attacks on Iran, and for, as he perceived, not succeeding sufficiently at undermining Iranian efforts to develop nuclear weapons.

that explains why Obama is now saying there is a MOLE in the WHITEHOUSE

did you know Obama's Mom was on the BBC? I think it's called Big Black Cock and it's as Communist as what you were first thinking.

Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.

Many may question whether this is really her. I'd post other photos of her, but I'd prefer you just Google her name, Stanley Ann Dunham, and compare these photos to ANY OTHER PHOTOGRAPH ever taken of her. I believe you'll come to the conclusion, this is Obama's Momma.

Anyway, the rumor has it these photos were taken by Frank Marshall Davis.

Hey Obama, Yo'Mamma

Political Prejudice at Yale

 

Political Prejudice at Yale

I had not intended to make this last week the week of criticizing historians, but I suppose it is turning out that way. As people know, many leading universities, such as MIT and Yale, have made many courses available on line for free. This is a great service. But this does not merely spread knowledge, it also opens a window to the educational bias that is going on in elite college classrooms.

I have been listening to a course given by Yale Historian David Blight entitled The Civil War and Reconstruction Era, 1845-1877. I was interested in the course because I am writing an article this summer involving Reconstruction. So I have listened to the second half of the course.

I would strongly recommend the course based on the content of the history taught as well as the engaging style of lecture. Blight also does a good job of debunking the Dunning school of Reconstruction History, which somehow I was taught as a lad in New York City of all places.

Despite these virtues, Blight’s course has a serious deficiency: his regular expressions of political prejudice. I would say every other lecture has a statement that involves a snide wisecrack attacking modern conservatives or Republicans. These statements have nothing to do with the course. The most recent example involves a crack about how Ronald Reagan is these days generally rated in the top 5 of presidents in American history, but Blight can think of no reason for this, except perhaps that there is an airport name for Reagan.

Now, one might think that these remarks are relatively harmless. But I can tell you as a student in many classrooms with professors who made such remarks, they are not. Imagine for a second that Blight inserted negative statements about blacks or gays in his lectures.

The introduction of internet course may have a beneficial effect on political biases in academia. Until now, most people, if they are aware of bigotry in academia are only aware second-hand. Let’s face it, adults are not the ones going to college. But when older people, those with mature political views are, exposed to bigoted rants from academia via on-line courses the blowback will be much greater than the occasional objection from the current student body. After all, to call the professor a bigot when you’re looking for passing grade takes more courage than most students are expected to have.

via moneyrunner.blogspot.com

Feinstein: Someone At White House Is Behind National Security Intel Leaks

(Pat Dollard)Excerpted from The Hill: Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Monday that someone at the White House was responsible for the recent leaks of classified information.

“I think the White House has to understand that some of this is coming from their ranks,” Feinstein said in an address at the World Affairs Council, the Associated Press first reported.

Feinstein said she was certain that President Obama had not disclosed any of the classified intelligence, but believed others in the administration were responsible.

“I don’t believe for a moment that he goes out and talks about it,” she said of the president.
Last month, reports in the press detailing a U.S. cyberattack against Iran and an administration terrorist “kill list” provoked outrage on Capitol Hill and led to bipartisan calls for an investigation into the disclosures.

Senior Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod has denied that the leaks came from sources in the White House.

“The authors of all of this work have said that the White House was not the source of this information. I can’t say that there weren’t leaks. There were obvious leaks, but they weren’t from the White House,” he said in an interview with ABC in early June.

Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed two U.S. attorneys to probe the leaks, but Republicans have continued calling for a special counsel, suggesting that the disclosures were made to politically aid the president.

Feinstein and other Democrats though have backed the DOJ investigation and maintain it will be fair and independent.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper responded quickly to the congressional backlash announcing last month that he would institute new steps to cut down on future leaks, including polygraph questions asking if employees leaked information to media members and a review of policies governing contacts between the press and members of the intelligence community.

Lawmakers have vowed to draft laws of their own to address the problem if they are unsatisfied with the response from the administration.

Reports said last week Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey testified before the House Armed Services Committee in a closed door hearing.

Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) said after the session that he was “pretty secure” that the leaks had not originated at the Defense Department.

Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. The person who fits that profile is the President