Libyan pilot, Mokhtar Mohammed Osman, crashes his jet into Gaddafi's secure compound

The pilot who flew his plane into Baab Al Aziziyah took off as part of a 2 plane team with the mission of bombing strategic points in Al Guradibya base in Sirte. Their orders were to return immedietly after completing the mission. One pilot followed orders while the other flew to Tripoli where he emptied what he had left of ammunition on Baab Al Aziziyah and then crashed his plane into it.

(Source)

via eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Obama’s moment of truth

Outstanding essay on the disaster in Libya and President Obama’s failure to act, by Larry Diamond in The New Republic. Diamond mainly discusses the consequences for the Libyan people, but I think that the harm will be global. Barack Obama’s America is showing itself to be a paper tiger; and every one of America’s enemies, especially the tyrants in Iran and Venezuela, are realizing that they can step up their aggression. If Gaddafi stays, he will resume his nuclear and chemical warfare plans and his support of global terrorism, secure in the knowledge that this American President will do nothing to stop him, unless the Russians and Chinese give permission.

via volokh.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Marxist and Muslim Meetings at Auckland University in New Zealand

Joe Carolan, center

The Marxist/Muslim alliance is a worldwide phenomenon. In New Zealand, Auckland University is a major center of this new "Axis of Evil".

On March 11, Auckland University's Marxist and radical Muslim activists got together to hold a
"2011: A year of Uprising: Middle East Freedom Forum".


Joe Carolan's Socialist Aotearoa and Students for Justice in Palestine were the main organizers, but the Communist League (NZ affiliate of the US Socialist Workers Party) also showed up with their cutesy little book stall.

Communist League stand

Other lefties in evidence included Amnesty on Campus, Oxfam, and Medical Students for Global Awareness.

Speakers included :  

• Mohsen Al-Attar - "What Arabs can learn from Malcolm X"
• Mohamed Hassan -"The role of youth and new media in the Egyptian Revolution"
• Rana Ghumkhor - "The importance of women during the uprisings and what the revolutions could mean for occupied lands"
• Bilel Ragued - "North African Revolutions - a personal perspective"
• Zaeem Baksh - "It's time, it's time, its Palestine"

Mohsen Al Attar, an Auckland University lecturer of  Canadian /Egyptian extraction, was described by one attendee as a very persuasive speaker, reminiscent almost of Van Jones. I have written extensively on Attar here, here and here.
Rana Ghumkhor, an Afghan refugee, has long been one of the most radical activists at Auckland University. She is hard core. She once wrote a short story, in the first person, telling the story of a suicide bombing on a bus outside Jerusalem.

For generations we suffered at the hands of the Zionists. Oh my insane rage vengeance will be ours, the clouds will clear and the sun will shine on us again....
I feel around in my pocket for the trigger that leads to the c4-tapped securely to my chest. I swallow the bile that had risen in my throat. I am afraid yes, I am afraid the bomb wont go off...
I clutch the trigger in my hand. I take the time to acknowledge each person in the bus. I feel the walls in my heart closing up for I feel no pity where we received none. I look out the window for the last time. The bus is coming over a hill. There lies Jerusalem in all its glory. I close my eyes and take my last breath…. Freedom...

Zaeem Baksh, has a Phd from the University of California, Berkeley, and has been active in Students for Justice in Palestine at Waikato and Auckland universities.
Speaker after speaker covered  all the usual bases;

• Vocal and emotional support of revolutions in all the Middle East
• Denouncement of "Apartheid Israel"
• Encouragement to boycott all Israeli goods
• Marxist-style anti-rich sentiment ("Why did we elect a $21 million prime minister?")
• Calls for the immediate removal of troops from Afghanistan (NZ troops)
• Anti-American sentiment, particularly perceived American imperialism

Following the "Middle East Freedom Forum", there was a student-led vigil in the quad, held in honor of the "thousands of students and citizens who have died protesting for freedom and democracy across North Africa and the Middle East in the last few weeks". 

Marxist Green Party MP Keith Locke also turned up. After supporting Pol Pot's invasion of Cambodia, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the murderous Philippines New Peoples Army, Irish Republicanism, the Palestinian Intifada and countless other Marxist and terrorist causes over the years, wild camels couldn't have kept him away.

A fun night of incitement to mayhem and socialist revolution was had by all!

via newzeal.blogspot.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Delaware: Stimulus-Funded Train Station to Be Named After Joe Biden…

The gaffe-master express.

(NBC Philly) — Frequent train rider, Vice President Joe Biden will be forever linked with the Wilmington train station.
In honor of the long-time Amtrak rider and strong advocate of passenger rail, the newly renovated station will be dedicated as the Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Railroad Station on Saturday.
As a U.S. Senator from Delaware for 36 years, Biden regularly traveled by train between Wilmington and Washington, D.C.
Wilmington Station underwent a nearly two-year, $37.7-million renovation. Funding for the project included $20 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

via weaselzippers.us

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Inhumanly Callous: Karl Vick at TIME.com

Who the hell is Karl Vick?

Well, for one thing he's the Jerusalem bureau chief for TIME Ragazine.  Oddly enough, though living at the center of the Jewish world, Mr. Vick begins his report of an Arab attack on Jews with an extraordinary display of resentment and antipathy toward our observance of the Sabbath:

The news broke on Saturday morning, and the shock was somehow both muted and amplified by the enforced public silence of the Jewish Sabbath. But Shabbat ended at sundown, and freed from the strictures of enforced rest, events lurched forward with something very like vengeance.

(What I would give for some of those "strictures of enforced rest" right now.)
Vick goes on to criticize not the Arab Muslims who worship their god by slitting the throats of babies and stabbing young children and young parents to death -- but the Israeli government, for responding to these cold-blooded executions with the building of homes, and for releasing crime-scene photos -- "JPEGs of the gruesome, evenly lit interior of a house, littered with children's toys and blood" -- to the press.  As if the government's actions offended his sensibilities (though apparently not the massacre itself).
Then Karl Vick reassures us with this callous statement that is our BtB Quote of the Day:

"The slaughter did not eradicate the family. "

Oh well, then it's okay I suppose, as long as it wasn't the whole family (even though "eradicate" is not the first word that comes to mind when speaking of beautiful young families).  From the tone of all this, I gather that our madman qua "journalist" thinks that we, the family of Jews, have somehow over-reacted to this non-eradication and should feel grateful that it wasn't even worse. After all, we could have been "eradicated."



 Ich hob im in bod! A feier zol im trefen.

A finstere cholem auf dein kopf und auf dein hent und fiss

via bokertov.typepad.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

When words lead to murder

When I saw my daughter crying while watching the news about the horrible murders in Itamar last Saturday night, I finally decided I had enough.
Enough of the barbaric ‘humans’ who slaughter a four month old baby, but also enough of the relentless campaign that caused the death of three Jewish children and their parents.
I am not only talking here about the incitement in Palestinian society, but also about the national and international demonization campaign against Jews like me who are living in Judea, Samaria or in East Jerusalem.

“Settlers” are generally being treated only in one way; we are less than human beings.
Our villages our branded” illegal” and in the end we ourselves have become “illegal beings”.
Last year during the launch of our public diplomacy project Missing Peace in Amsterdam, a Ha’aretz journalist asked how an information desk run by a director living in the West Bank could be reliable.
Get it? By living in the West Bank one is automatically an unreliable outcast.
Do not think this is only the opinion of a leftist Israeli journalist, I know of plenty of European officials who think the same.
During a fact finding tour in the Gush Etzion area for Israeli’s a while ago, we visited several places where Palestinians and Jews are meeting or work together.
After visiting a garage where 10 local Jews are working together with ten Palestinians from Hebron, the participants started to complain about propaganda. Thereafter we interviewed a Palestinian contractor in Efrat who talked about his twenty year old relationship with the local Jews.
When the guy told that he liked to work in Efrat and bluntly stated that life had been much better before Oslo, someone even suggested he had been bribed.
It simply could not be true that a Palestinian had a positive story to tell about ‘settlers’.
Several young people told me that a date came to an abrupt end when they revealed that they were living on the West Bank.
A friend who used to work for the Dutch embassy in Tel Aviv, saw his contract terminated when the embassy staff found out he was living in Efrat. He received a letter in which he was told that he lived in the wrong place.
These are only few examples of how incitement against Jews on the West Bank worked out.
After the news broke about the Itamar murders we saw government officials issuing the usual calls for international condemnation of this barbaric act.
On Sunday the Israeli government declared that it would establish a special team that will monitor Palestinian incitement.
Nothing however, has been said about the other source of incitement that caused the dehumanization of roughly half a million Jews.
Even on the day that the five members of the Fogel family were buried, a large part of the foreign media continued its demonization campaign against the Jews living across the Green Line.
The New York Times and the Washington Post reported that ‘five settlers’ had been killed. The BBC buried the news in an article about new ‘settler homes’ and Sky did not even report the news for 48 hours.
Countless are the examples of the foreign media using only Palestinian sources for stories about ‘settlers’.
Just last week it was widely reported that ‘6 Palestinians were shot in clashes with settlers’. Thanks to a well known Israeli blogger, in this case the truth came to light.
The Palestinians initiated an attack on a Jew and were wounded in the ensuing clash with the IDF.
This kind of reporting has created the picture that all Jews on the West Bank are extremist criminals. The fact that the overwhelming majority of those people are working, studying and law abiding citizens who succeeded to establish some of the finest communities in Israel, is even in Israel hardly known.
The demonization campaign against Jews living across the green line should have been addressed a long time ago. Now the decease has spread to the state as a whole and threatens our very existence in this country.
The Talmud in tractate Peah 1:1 states that Lashon HaRa (evil speech) is equivalent to murder.
In this case disinformation by large parts of the media led to delegitimization and that caused the demonization of a large part of Israeli society.
The events in Itamar on Shabbat proved that in such a climate eventually actual physical murder becomes the next step.
That is why the government should give countering the global dehumanization campaign against the Jews on the West Bank even more priority than the fight against Palestinian incitement. The establishment of a West Bank based rapid respons anti-incitement team that concentrates on this issue would be a good first step.

via missingpeace.eu

The Jewish settler family that was butchered by the swords, used by the followers of Muhammad.

image via ivarfjeld.wordpress.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Lebanese politician describes veiled Saudi Women as resembling black garbage bags, riots ensue

but I prefer....

this Trash Bag to Wear...

There were demonstrations anyway. Angry Arab calls them riots. Here is the story from YaLibnan:

Druze religious leader Sheikh el Aql Naim Hassan condemned on Tuesday Wiam Wahab’s description of veiled Saudi women as “black trash bags, ” Future News reported
Future News also reported that Hassan, who is the highest Druze spiritual authority called President Michel Suleiman earlier in the day to condemn the comments made by Wahab, who is a Druze.
Wahab , a staunch ally of Syria and Hezbollah told OTV on Monday “Saudi women are black trash bags we see nothing of,” in reference to their attire. He also slammed outgoing Prime Minister Saad Hariri and Saudi Arabia.
In a related development angry protesters took to the streets and blocked North Lebanon’s international road in protest against Wahab’s comments on Saudi women.
Around 500 protesters gathered and chanted "There is no God but God" and "Wiam, you pig; you should be chained down."
National News Agency (NNA) reported that the northern Abboudiyeh road that links Lebanon to Syria was blocked by burning tires.
The NNA added that security forces intervened to try and re-open the road.
Tripoli is Lebanon’s second-largest city and is considered the stronghold of the country’s Sunni Muslim community, which is the majority in Saudi Arabia. [...]

Walid Jumblatt and Hezbollah also condemned the statement. "Black garbage bags" is probably too harsh a description. Burritos might be a more diplomatic comparison.

via judeopundit.blogspot.com
images via chinadroll.wordpress.com via americanbedu.com and via godammit.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Publicly Funded La Raza Group Expands

The influential Mexican La Raza group that’s received millions of federal tax dollars to promote its leftist, open-borders agenda has added several new branches to its growing network of community organizations dedicated to serving Latinos.
Among them is yet another public “charter” school that pushes a radical Chicano movement, known as “reconquista,” with a custom-designed curriculum financed by U.S. taxpayers. The plan is to conquer the American southwest, return it to Mexico and perform ethnic cleansing of Americans, Europeans, Africans and Asians.
The politically-connected, Washington D.C. group National Council of La Raza (NCLR) has helped further this agenda by expanding its operations nationwide with the generous help of Uncle Sam. This month the NCLR, which describes itself as the largest Latino civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States, announced the addition of seven affiliates to its network of 300 “community groups.” The new chapters are located in different parts of the country, including Minnesota, Maryland, Illinois, Michigan and Colorado.
Among them is a publicly-funded high school (“El Colegio”or The School) in Minneapolis with an innovative curriculum that focuses on ethnicity. “El Colegio” describes itself as a “Latino-focused” school that integrates experimental-based teaching strategies using Chicano, Mexican and Latino cultures and traditions. This month it became an official affiliate of the NCLR, which helps operate similar schools in other parts of the country.
Judicial Watch exposed this La Raza movement in American public education a few years ago in a special report focusing on a Southern California elementary school that specializes in bashing the U.S. and promoting the Chicano movement. That NCLR-backed school (Academias Semillas Del Pueblo) is a training ground for the Mexican reconquista agenda and is run by a Calexico-educated activist (Marcos Aguilar) who opposes racial integration and says Mexicans in the U.S. don't want to attend white schools or drink from white water fountains.
It may seem baffling that American tax dollars are wasted on such causes, but the explanation is rather simple. The NCLR is powerful and politically connected with leaders regularly attending congressional hearings and White House meetings. The group, which endorsed and campaigned for Obama in 2008, is also tight with the administration.
In fact, fact the president violated his own lobbyist ban to hire one of the NCLR’s top officials (Cecilia Munoz) as director of intergovernmental affairs. Munoz supervised all legislative and advocacy activities on the state and local levels and was heavily involved in the congressional immigration battles before Obama issued an “ethics waiver” to make her part of his administration.
Obama’s first Supreme Court appointee, Sonia Sotomayor, was also a member of the NCLR and the group was quick to thank the president for the “historic appointment,” which it called a “monumental day for Latinos.” No wonder, in its latest press release announcing new affiliates the NCLR points out that its “impact continues to grow on a daily basis.” via judicialwatch.org

WHAT IS RAZA

“La Raza” (The Race) is a broad term which refers to those whose ancestry is indigenous to the area of Mexico (or “Aztlan”). MEChA members refer to themselves as “La Raza” or “Raza,” but the term itself is used to indicate camaraderie among those in different organizations with the same objectives. There are a number of organizations who consider themselves to be La Raza.

The most visible of these groups are MEChA, The Brown Berets de Aztlan, OLA (Organization for the Liberation of Aztlan), La Raza Unida Party, and the “Nation of Aztlan” to name a few.  Although the activism of these organizations vary from somewhat radical to extremely radical, they share the same objectives, the “liberation of Aztlan.”  Each follows the Raza manifesto “El Plan de Aztlan (sometimes called “El Plan Espiritual de Aztlan”). The Nation of Aztlan, tied to La Voz de Aztlan disseminates the exact same propaganda that MEChA spreads including antisemitic propaganda. Believers in the Aztlan legend insist upon the indivisibility of “La Raza” and their common goals, one of them being the need to abolish the border between the U.S. and Mexico. There is a myriad of Raza college newspaper. Some are El Popo, Aztlan News, Chispas, Gente de Aztlan (UCLA), Voz Fronteriza (U.C. San Diego), La Voz Mestiza (U.C. Irvine) and La Voz Berkeley. It is not uncommon for the writers of these publications to refer to the U.S., as “AmeriKKKa.”

Rhetoric by some Chicano educators strongly suggest Communist or Socialist leanings. In May, 2000, more than 1,200 students gathered at UCLA for the seventh annual Raza Youth Conference, which the members say promotes higher education and recognition of the Aztlan culture. Sponsored by MEChA, the year’s theme was “Reclaiming Our Razas through education, resistance, and promoting the idea of remembering the historical struggles of Raza” said Erika Ramirez, co-chair of the conference. The conference drew students from 80 middle and high schools and community colleges; featured speeches by those actively involved with the Chicano community.

The keynote speaker was Antonia Darder, a professor of education and cultural studies at Claremont Graduate University and director of the Institute for Cultural Studies in Education, who received a standing ovation for her speech.

Darder described American capitalism and what she said were its impacts on racism and sexism. “I grew up in a capitalist society, a society that taught us that the greed of corporations control politics,” Darder said. “Capitalism is the root of domination. Racism and sexism exist because capitalism requires it.” Darder said a globalized economy forced smaller countries to give up their self-sufficiency, resulting in people migrating to the U.S. “We’re here because U.S. foreign policy in Latin America has forced us here,” she said.

The University of Oregon Chapter of MEChA hints at its communist sentiments by posting a picture of Cuba’s communist dictator Fidel Castro. On its web site, “La Voz de Aztlan” has an excerpt from a speech of February 7, 1997, by Fidel Castro who said “the United States should return to Mexico huge chunks of that country’s territories it acquired more than a century ago” La Voz de Aztlan, whom Antonio Villaraigosa refuses to repudiate, also disseminates antisemitic propaganda,

Apparently, these “Raza” cults are composed of people who unabashedly hate the United States and often support other groups and leaders who also hate America. Raza’s hatred of America is so intense, that most make bedfellows to anyone else who also hates America, like dictator Fidel Castro; murderer of his own people Sadam Hussain; and the women hating Taliban — and of course they sympathize with all Islamic Terrorists over the Israel/Palestine issue. Raza cults are the loudest and most insistent element of the immigration lobby in California. Inebriated with a sense of righteous victimhood, and entranced by myths of a heroic racial past, devotees of the Aztlan cults are rapidly extending their influence within California’s Hispanic population, particularly among students in the university system.

——————————-

In closing, they can all go straight to hell! If we are going to have our tax money go to provide for those that come here illegally, then we should have the right to charge Mexico an upkeep fee for every illegal in our country. We start at $20,000 thousand dollars per person (per year) and go up in price from there.

via giovanniworld.wordpress.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Religious Accommodations in Court Holding Cells, Islamic Headscarves, and Statutory Construction

A unanimous 11-member en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit has just reversed a decision, and held that the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act secures a limited right to religious accommodations in court holding cells, and not just in prisons and jails. (My former boss, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, dissented from that earlier decision; his conclusion has now carried the day before the en banc panel.) Here is an excerpt explaining the issue:

Recognizing the significance of religious freedom in all aspects of life, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA” or “the Act”) to “protect[ ] institutionalized persons who are unable freely to attend to their religious needs and are therefore dependent on the government’s permission and accommodation for exercise of their religion.” Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, 721 (2005). RLUIPA prohibits state and local governments from imposing “a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution” unless the government demonstrates that imposing that burden “is the least restrictive means” of furthering “a compelling governmental interest.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a). The term “institution” includes “a jail, prison, or other correctional facility” and “a pretrial detention facility.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997(1)(B). We consider whether the Orange County Santa Ana Courthouse holding facility, where every day hundreds of individuals are detained in connection with court proceedings, is an “institution” as defined by RLUIPA. We conclude that this facility is such an “institution” under RLUIPA, and thus the Act covers persons detained at the facility.
Our interpretation of the statute is guided by three principles. To begin, the focus of our inquiry is narrow and preliminary. The only question before us is whether Orange County’s facility is an “institution” under RLUIPA; other courthouse or detention facilities have unique characteristics that warrant individualized review. Next, we are mindful that the issue of accommodation — whether the substantial burden on religious exercise is “the least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest” — is distinct from the threshold issue of whether the facility is a covered “institution” in the first place. 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a). The accommodation question involves serious practical considerations regarding institutional safety, security, and the feasibility of accommodation that are not before us now. Finally, Congress has explicitly directed us to resolve any ambiguities in RLUIPA “in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-3(g) (emphasis added).

Thanks to How Appealing for the pointer.

via volokh.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Anti-Semitism at UC Santa Cruz

The U.S. Department of Education is looking into it:

The investigation comes in the wake of a 2009 complaint by lecturer Tammi Rossman-Benjamin. Rossman-Benjamin, who teaches Hebrew on campus, has also published a paper titled “Anti-Zionism and the Abuse of Academic Freedom: A Case Study at the University of California, Santa Cruz.” According to her, no other group on campus has been subjected to “such hostile and demonizing criticism” as Jewish students.

And from that paper, published at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs:

Over the past several years, faculty members at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) have injected anti-Zionist rhetoric into their courses and departmentally-sponsored events. For example, a community-studies class designed to train social activists was taught by an instructor who described herself in her online syllabus as an activist with the "campaign against the Apartheid Wall being built in Palestine," and whose recommended readings included such unreferenced statements as: "Israeli massacres are often accompanied by sexual assault, particularly of pregnant women as a symbolic way of uprooting the children from the mother, or the Palestinian from the land."
The previous summer, the same lecturer taught a community-studies course on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in which she used the class email list to encourage students to participate in a demonstration against Israel's "destructive actions" in Lebanon and Gaza outside the Israeli consulate in San Francisco. UCSC students also report that some professors insert into class lectures anti-Israel or anti-Zionist materials unrelated to the course, as when a full class period in a course on women's health activism was devoted to a lecture on the allegedly ruthless treatment of Palestinians by Israeli soldiers.
At the departmental level, since 2001 more than a dozen events dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have been sponsored by a number of UCSC departments and research centers, and all of these have been biased against Israel.

Nope. No anti-Semitism here. Nothing to see. Move along.See SantaCruz.com (via Instapundit).

via americanpowerblog.blogspot.com

images via alittlefishy
and via goslugs.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

JCC Watch rips JCC of the Upper West Side

For those of you wondering why the
JCC logo has been censored, go here.

At a press conference in New York on Sunday, JCC Watch ripped the JCC of the Upper West Side of Manhattan for cooperating with organizations that promote boycott, divestiture and sanctions (BDS) against Israel.

The JCC of the Upper West Side, notes the watchdog group, is a beneficiary agency of the UJA-Federation. BDS was launched in 2005 by various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) which seek to demonize, delegitimize, and ultimately destroy Israel by the spread of misinformation, incitement, and promotion of various boycotts.
In a news conference held Sunday afternoon in front of the JCC offices, JCC Watch reported that the organization is partnering with a number of pro-BDS organizations.
Among those listed were the leftist organizations New Israel Fund, B'Tselem, Human Rights Watch, and J Street.
JCC Watch founder Richard Allen called on the JCC board of directors to establish public and transparent guidelines regarding BDS.
“It’s time that the board of directors of the JCC in Manhattan take action. It’s simple: all they have to do is stop supporting groups that partner with, fund, or support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel,” Allen said.

read more via israelmatzav.blogspot.com

I know the rabbi of that JCC. I had my Bar Mitzvah at a Reconstructionist Synagogue called B'nai Keshet in Montclair NJ.  Joy Levitt is a very sick woman. this is not political for me. this is personal.
Joy had me thrown out of Hebrew school at B'nai Keshet ...if I remember correctly. I drew a picture of my teacher when I was 13 years old. for the record I was wrong... and it wasn't a female teacher it was a male teacher, but I was 13 years old. I had to train for my Bar Mitzvah with the Orthodox because the Reconstructionist synagogue would not allow me to go to Hebrew school. These women are out to hurt Western men. It is their agenda. The girls are coddled and groomed and the boys are given hairy eyeballs. I have pictures of girls dancing with each other at my Bar Mitzvah party. at the time it didn't mean anything to me. now I realize they were reinforcing Anti-Social behavior. Very few of the kids still talk to each other. Just about every girl who was in my Bar Mitzvah class is now a lesbian. The one straight girl there in my class was known to be promiscuous. when they elected Obama president... it felt like Montclair NJ started running the government. I used to get beat up by black kids and my parents would take me to a shrink and the guy would say... "you don't know how to read people". yeah right... I read the hate just fine

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Bahrain blows it's TOP!

اوائل الصور لشهيد ستره - لاتصلح للقلوب الضعيفه

The king of Bahrain has declared a state of emergency across the country for three months. Local police are now being backed up by 1,000 Saudi troops, who entered the country on Monday following weeks of political unrest.
Among those wounded in violent protests are undercover police found in the Shia areas of Bahrain, where hospital staffers are overwhelmed by the influx of the injured.
Al Jazeera's correspondent sent this report from a hospital in the capital, Manama

via librabunda.blogspot.com

image via twitpic.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

But what did he say in Arabic?

Carl
Israel Matzav
15 March '11
Jennifer Rubin describes the cajoling that took place in order to get 'moderate' 'Palestinian' President Mahmoud Abbas Abu Mazen to "cough up a remotely appropriate statement."
Jennifer concludes:

This episode is instructive. First, despite the Obama team’s efforts to gussy up the Palestinian Authority, it exhibits no leadership. Abbas had to be dragged for 48 hours to cough up a remotely appropriate statement. And even then, he rejected any responsibility for the PA’s official efforts to glorify terrorists. However, the episode also reveals that when significant pressure is applied to the PA, its behavior can be modified. If only the Obama administration would spend a fraction of its time denouncing terrorist incitement by the Palestinians as it does pounding Israel on settlements, we might be making progress. But in the meantime, the Itamar massacre only reinforces the conclusion that the PA is unwilling and unable to police its own side. Does President Obama really imagine that Israel would withdraw from the West Bank anytime soon?

It's worse than that. What Jennifer doesn't mention is that the statement that the Obama administration finally dragged out of Abu Mazen was given in English (and still disclaimed blame for the incitement that led to the Itamar attack). What did he say in Arabic? From what I have seen, Abu Bluff has not made any amendments to his initial statement in Arabic on Saturday. That means that while the West has been told what it wants to hear by Abu Mazen, the 'Palestinian people' are still left with the following as described by Jennifer:
(Read full "But what did he say in Arabic?")

via calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Elder of Ziyon: Latest "Apartheid?" poster

Judge George Kara:

Entire "apartheid" poster series here.

via elderofziyon.blogspot.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Photos of Siezed Weapons headed for Hamas

The following photos were taken today and provided by the IDF Spokesman's Office.
They document the weapons found aboard the "Victoria" arms smuggling ship, in which these Iranian supplied weapons were being channeled to Gaza, via a boat that embarked from Syria.
Thank God the IDF intercepted this boat, or these would be used against Israeli children and our civilian population by Hamas.

• Israel acted in self-defense: The illegal smuggling of arms to the Gaza Strip poses a direct and imminent threat to the safety and security of the State of Israel and its citizens, who continue to find themselves under the unceasing attack of rocket and mortar fire originating from Gaza.
  

• The Iranian connection: Preliminary evidence indicates that the weapons aboard the ship originated in Iran, which strives to arm the Gaza Strip. Under Hamas rule, the Gaza Strip has become part of the Iranian-Syrian-Hamas axis.
  

• Smuggling arms to terrorists is illegal: Such transfer of weaponry to terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip constitutes a blatant violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1860(2009), which calls upon Member States to intensify efforts to "prevent illicit trafficking in arms and ammunition" to the Gaza Strip (para. 6), as well as a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1373(2001), which, inter alia, calls upon all States to refrain from the provision of any form of support to terrorist organizations and to eliminate the supply of weapons to such groups. Israel is also looking into the possibility of additional violations of other relevant UN Security Council resolutions.
  

• An act of deception: It should be noted that nothing in the freight manifest of the Victoria revealed the true nature of the content of the ship's containers, in violation of the relevant provisions of the International Maritime Organization's Conventions and professional standards, including the Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code.
  

• One of many smuggling attempts: There have been a number of previous instances (including incidents involving the Santorini, Abu Hassan, the Karine A, the Hansa India, the Monchegorsk, the Francop and Everest cargo vessels) in which otherwise innocent transnational commercial shipping was abused by States that sponsor terrorism, including Iran, Syria and Lebanon, in order to facilitate the illegal trafficking of arms to terrorist organizations in the region. See: http://bit.ly/ArmsShips

Blogger Press Conference and More Coverage, here.

via muqata.blogspot.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Radiation Fears Threaten Relief Effort

Reuters

Soldiers and a rescue worker carry the body of a resident through Kesennuma City on March 15.

TOKYO—An evolving nuclear crisis in quake-hit Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan, could add misery to hundreds of thousands of quake victims by possibly forcing relief organizations to withdraw their operations.
"The Japanese Red Cross Society is committed to rescue any victims, including those of nuclear radiation," JRCS spokesman Mutsuhiko Owaki said. "But we cannot send rescue workers to places where there is a clear risk of radiation exposure," he added, indicating that the group will have to limit its operations to areas where such risks are low.

via online.wsj.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

J’Accuse: Palestinians of War Crimes and Genocide

Palestinian and Arab propaganda has demonized Jewish settlers as illegal, fanatic, racist, violent, angry, and hell-bent on revenge. The mainstream media has followed suit and has consistently justified Palestinian terrorism against Israelis as caused by the "provocative" settlements. People consistently forget that Arabs were murdering Jewish civilians on a mass basis for fifty years before the Jewish state was born and then for an additional twenty years before Israel won the 1967 war of self-defense, long before there were "settlements." The Arab murder of Israeli civilians continues to this day. Please see the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs website on "Which Came First – Terrorism or 'Occupation'?"

Based on the United Nations and Nuremberg definitions of “genocide,” I hereby accuse the  Palestinian Arabs of committing both “war crimes” and “genocide” against the Jews. Palestinians terrorists have just murdered three children and two unarmed, civilian adults in cold blood. Historically, Palestinian Arabs have murdered—on purpose, not by accident— thousands of Jewish children and Jewish and Israeli civilians. Their intent is as genocidal as Ahmadinejad’s. They wish to abolish the Jewish state and slaughter all the Jews. They say so themselves.

Read the complete original version of this item... via frontpagemag.com via phyllis-chesler.com

March 15 Update: Palestinian Denials Reach New Nadir, Blame Tai Workers 

March 14 -- In the wake of the murders of five members of the Fogel family, including a toddler and an infant, Hamas announced:

Palestinian National Movement Hamas official Ezzat Al-Rashak said that the movement is not responsible for the murder of the five family members from the Itamar settlement.

Al-Rashak confirmed that harming children is not part of Hamas' policy, nor is it the policy of the resistance factions.

He also confirmed that the possibility that the incident was carried out by settlers for criminal motives should not be ruled out.

This is not the first time that Hamas has denied its practice of targeting children. Following the 2004 terrorist attack against Russian schoolchildren, a Hamas official similarly denied that the terror group targets children. As CAMERA noted at the time, the Associated Press reported:

The Palestinian militant group Hamas contends its policy is not to target children, although it justifies attacks on civilians to avenge Israeli army attacks on ordinary citizens.

“We are freedom fighters, not gangs,” a senior Hamas official in Gaza told the AP. “Women and children are not a target for Hamas. They have never been a target and they will never be our main target despite the daily killing of our women and children by Israel in cold blood.”

Abu Mahmoud, a spokesman for the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in the West Bank, said the group was “shocked by what we see on television” about the Russian school standoff.

“We would never agree to such a thing,” he said. “We never did such a thing and never would. When there is an explosion and children are killed, we are sorry for this because this was a mistake, not on purpose.”

Back in 2004, CAMERA's Lee Green compiled the following list of attacks in which Hamas and other "resistance factions" (ie, terror groups) clearly targeted children. The children were not accidental victims, but were intentionally shot or bombed. For example:

• March 5, 2003 — Palestinian terrorists chose to bomb Bus 37 in Haifa shortly after school let out. The bus is on a school route and 9 schoolchildren were among the 17 killed in that attack. Dozens of children were wounded.

• Dec. 3, 2003 — Palestinian terrorists planned to blow up schoolchildren at the Ort Alon High School in Yokneam, the sister city of St. Louis. Thankfully, due to Israeli intelligence sources and the security fence, the Israelis were able to catch the bombers before they reached the school.

• May 2, 2004 — Terrorists ambushed the car of Tali Hatuel, who was 9 months pregnant, and shot her and her four young daughters, aged 2, 7, 9 and 11. It was daylight and the terrorists obviously knew they were killing four small children because they shot them all at point blank range.

Suicide terrorists see exactly who they are going to kill before they detonate themselves. If they didn't want to kill children, they could walk out of their chosen restaurants, buses and teen discos, and choose a different target when they saw that many children were present.

• June 1, 2001 — a Palestinian terrorist chose to detonate himself among a long line of teenagers , their youth clearly visible to him, at the Dolphinarium disco in Tel Aviv. 11 teenagers under the age of 18 were among the dead.

• Mar 2, 2002 —Outside of a Jerusalem synagogue, a terrorist detonated a bomb next to a group of mainly women standing outside with their young children, several in baby carriages . The victims: Shlomo Nehmad (40), his wife Gafnit (32), and their daughters Shiraz (7) and Liran (3); Avraham Eliahu Nehmad, (7), Shaul Nehmad (15); Lidor Ilan (12) and his sister Oriah (18 months); Tzofia Ya'arit Eliyahu (23) and her son Ya'akov Avraham (seven months); and Avi Hazan, (37). The Fatah Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade took responsibility for the attack.

• Aug 19, 2003 — Twenty-three people were killed, including seven children when a Palestinian suicide bomber detonated himself on a No. 2 Egged bus in Jerusalem's Shmuel Hanavi neighborhood. The bus was filled with children. Hamas claimed responsibility for the attack. The child victims: Shmuel Taubenfeld, 3 months, of New Square, New York; Shmuel Zargari, 11 months; Tehilla Nathanson, 3; Issachar Reinitz, 9; Avraham Bar-Or, 12; Binyamin Bergman, 15; Elisheva Meshulami, 16.

• Nov. 20, 2000 — terrorists attacked a bus carrying children from Kfar Darom to school in Gush Katif. Five children were injured, many of whom had limbs blown off.

• Mar 26, 2001 — a Palestinian sniper took aim at 10 month old Shalhevet Pass, who was sitting in her stroller. She was fatally shot in the head. This was hardly an “accident.” She was the target, even though her father was standing right beside her.

• Nov. 10, 2002 — Revital Ohayon, 34, and her two sons, Matan, 5, and Noam, 4, were shot to death by an Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade terrorist who broke into their home at Kibbutz Metzer.

• May 9, 2001 — Yossi Ish-Ran, 14, and Kobi Mandell, 14 , both of Tekoa, were savagely beaten to death with stones in a cave about 200 meters from the small community south of Jerusalem where they lived.

Unfortunately, since 2004, many more names have joined this horrific list.

• Apr 2, 2009 - Shlomo Nativ, 13, was killed by an axe-wielding terrorist in his community of Bat Ayin in Gush Etzion.

• Mar 6, 2008 - Eight students of the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva in Jerusalem were killed when a terrorist armed with a Kalashnikov assault rifle infiltrated the yeshiva and opened fire in the library where about 80 people were gathered, mostly teenagers. Eleven others were wounded, three critically. Among the victims were Segev Peniel Avihail, 15, of Neve Daniel; Neria Cohen, 15, of Jerusalem; Yonatan Yitzhak Eldar, 16, of Shilo; Yohai Lifshitz, 17, of Jerusalem; and  Avraham David Moses, 16, of Efrat.

• March 30, 2006 - Shaked Lasker, 16, of Kedumim was killed when a suicide bomber hitchhiker disguised as an ultra-Orthodox yeshiva student detonated his explosive device in a private vehicle near the entrance to Kedumim.

• Oct. 16, 2005 - Oz Ben-Meir, 15, of Maon were killed and three were wounded when Palestinians opened fire at the Gush Etzion junction south of Jerusalem. Another teenager was shot and seriously wounded near Eli, in Samaria. The Fatah Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility for both attacks.

Additional Palestinian Denials

There were plenty more influential Palestinians suffering from denial following the murder of the Fogel family, and they weren't only from Hamas. For instance, writing in his regular column, in the Palestinian Authority-controlled newspaper Al Hayat Al-Jadida, Adli Sadek stated:

It bears repeating that the murder of children, if carried out by Palestinian hands, must not be part of the national struggle, which has generally sought . . . to engage with the soldiers of the occupation and not hurt Israeli children. (Quoted in Ha'aretz)

Ha'aretz also reported:

Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki, however, was one of a number of senior PA officials who continued to imply that the Fogels were not murdered for nationalist reasons. "People and an infant were butchered in a way no Palestinian has ever done. . . raising questions about Israel's rush to accuse the Palestinians," he said. (ibid)

Denials like these, completely disconnected from reality and the historical record, give a shot of adrenaline to the anti-Israel conspiracy types, lurking in talkback threads, and absurdly blaming the Mossad for the massacre of a Jewish family. Take, for example, "ausjustice," who posts his vitriol on the Los Angeles Times at 12:29 AM today:

My latest information is that the settler family murders were carried out under the direction of a Shin Bet unit and authorised from the highest level. It was considered acceptable to "sacrifice"  the family for the purposes of raising Israeli anger against Palestinians, attracting international sympathy for Israel, strengthening pressure on the PA and justifying the continued un-official policy of settlement expansion.

Israeli support for the hardline right wing policies has been fading and opposition against extremist settlers increasing in recent months threatening the government of BN and increasing international calls for a resolution of borders with an increasing number of countries recognising a Palestinian state outside the '67 borders.

There is no doubt who is to gain from these murders. A few will question the high probability this attack originated  from their own government departments. It has been common practice for Mossad to arrange "false fleg" operations dating back to terrorist bombings of British and American interests prior to 1948,  their bombing Synagogues in Iraq to hasten the flow of migrants to the new state,  while laying blame on Arabs.

Undoubtedly a few Palestinians have already been ear marked to accept the blame and will confess under torture. 

The incitement originating from Hamas and Palestinian Authority officials echoes through the cesspools of the American talkbacks, laying the groundwork for yet another attack against innocent civilians.

March 15 Update: Palestinian Denials Reach New Nadir, Blame Tai Workers

The Jerusalem Post and Ha'aretz report today that a number of Web sites linked to the Palestinian Authority are blaming the Fogel's murders on a Tai worker. (See, for example, the Palestinian Ma'an News Agency.) Avi Issacharoff and Amos Harel commendably point out the falsity of Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki's claim that Palestinians don't engage is such brutal violence:

At this point, though, all the signs indicate the Itamar massacre was a terror attack. Malki seems to have forgotten the dozens of attacks carried out by Palestinian terrorists - intent on killing children, women and old people. In November 2002, Sirhan Sirhan entered a house in Kibbutz Metzer and murdered a mother and her two children, aged 4 and 5, after killing another man and woman. This is just one example of several.

via camera.org

Settlements Provoke Baby Killing?

Honest Reporting
Which is worse — stabbing children to death or building new houses in West Bank settlements? The answer is obvious. But that’s not the point. The point is that no matter how abhorrent the murders are, it serves no purpose to aggravate the provocation that led to them in the first place.
So according to the LA Times, baby killing is a natural response to an Israeli provocation, in this case the act of building houses. Is this any different to the vicious rhetoric of Hamas, which justified the murders? March 15, 2011 13:48 by Simon Plosker
The inhuman act of slitting the throats of a three-month old baby, two small children and their parents defies any understanding or justification for any political cause. But not for the LA Times, which contends that the brutal murder of the Fogel family are part of an ongoing “cycle of violence”:
We’re currently witnessing the cycle in real time. On Saturday, five members of an Israeli family living in the West Bank settlement of Itamar, near the Palestinian city of Nablus, were killed, including an 11-year-old boy, a 4-year-old boy and an infant girl, presumably by Palestinian militants. In response to this brutal tragedy, the Israeli government announced that it would build 500 more houses in existing settlements in the West Bank. Interior Minister Eli Yishai said Sunday that 500 was not enough and that Israel should build 1,000 new homes for every Israeli who is killed there.

Which is worse — stabbing children to death or building new houses in West Bank settlements? The answer is obvious. But that’s not the point. The point is that no matter how abhorrent the murders are, it serves no purpose to aggravate the provocation that led to them in the first place.
So according to the LA Times, baby killing is a natural response to an Israeli provocation, in this case the act of building houses. Is this any different to the vicious rhetoric of Hamas, which justified the murders?
The LA Times asks:
How will building more houses for Israelis in the midst of the West Bank, in settlements that are almost universally acknowledged to violate international law, do anything other than keep the crisis going? Answer: It won’t.
Perhaps the LA Times should be asking how the butchering of babies, which is universally condemned, will do anything other than keep the crisis going? But instead, the paper cares little for placing responsibility for Palestinian actions on the Palestinians themselves let alone dealing with the very real issue of incitement in the Palestinian media and education system.
As for the claim that this brutal act is simply part of a “cycle of violence”, this is a charge that has been employed on a regular basis by lazy media that cannot differentiate between Palestinian terror, Israeli self-defense or non-violent acts of building homes. The Jerusalem Post eloquently debunked this as far back as 2008:
In truth, however, there is no cycle of violence. There is no spiral of attack and counter-attack relentlessly unfolding here.

What we have, rather, on the one hand, is a sovereign nation’s desperate effort to live in its homeland, seek peace with those of its neighbors who will partner it, and defend itself against those who seek its destruction. And, on the other, we have the forces of militant Islam, firing rockets across Israel’s sovereign borders, murdering Israelis wherever they can be found vulnerable, indoctrinating their people with a vicious intolerance of Jewish historical rights in this region, and simultaneously spreading a perverted interpretation of Islam that purports to require each and every believer to carry out personal jihad in the name of God against the infidels – be they Jews, Christians or unbelieving Muslims.

Some sample responses from readers:
1.
Eve Cameron
4:15 pm
Mar 15, 2011
I am beginning to think that our nation is filled with the brain dead! How can this be happening? There are no words….
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 0
Reply
2.
Tzipporah
4:16 pm
Mar 15, 2011
Excuses, excuses. The only thing that would appease these Moslem lunatics would be for all the Jews to go away. I don’t think they hate us as much as they hate themselves and are jealous because we are a “life gives you lemons, then make lemonade” people. No matter what, there is no excuse to stab an innocent family because someone doesn’t want them there. In terms of illegal settlements, forget about it. The land was won in a war. The Palestinians shouldn’t have waged the war if they weren’t willing to suffer the consequences. And the consequences are more land for the Jews and for Israel. Because I like the idea of expansion so much, I am going to buy more Israeli Bonds or donate to the country.
If a Jewish person did this, the international and LA Times condemnation would be crazy, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a hypocrite.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 0
Reply
3.
Leah
4:17 pm
Mar 15, 2011
So according to the LA Times, if a woman is attractive, and she looks beautiful, she is asking to be raped? If a child is sweet and innocent, they are asking to be molested? It is the victims fault?
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 1
Reply
4.
Jeff Broude
4:22 pm
Mar 15, 2011
What unadulterated crap.
Through thousands of years of unacceptable persecution at the hands of all the non- Jews of this world, never once did the Jewish People ever even contemplate this sort of barbaric murder.
Even in Africa the oppressed don’t do this, and there are millions of them.
What unashamed evil to just blame it on cycles.
What we do see is evil oppressors doing this.
Bingo the Arabs are ergo evil oppressors.
Check out what they do to their own people.
Bombing civilians and more.
Creating a refugee/palastinian problem, for what ? No not for state hood.
They never had one ever.
The never wanted one while they were trying to murder the Jewish State with a regular army.
They failed, and then used the palestinian lie( check out arab archives).
That explains why from 1948 to 1967 the occupied land of Israel (Judea and Shomron) by Jordan and Egypt was never given state hood to the so called palestinians, or even mentioned. Because they did not exist.
what evil.
They have 22 States and Jordan is basically Palestine.
No it is the cruel evil plan to oppress the Jewish people, while tying their hands behind their backs.
So the great Arabs oppress and torture their own in order to achieve their greed and cynically create abject poverty in an oppressed and demented bunch of people in the hope of oppressing and murdering the Jewish People.
Just sick, and even more sick to see the western liberals go with it.
What evil.
Not so original as that is what the non-Jewish anti-semites did for thousands of years.
And the civilised world. what are they doing. Winging about Toilets being built in Israel.
What crap.
Well-loved. Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
Reply
5.
Nvaneerde@hotmail.com
4:31 pm
Mar 15, 2011
The palistineans do not want peace they want death and martyrdom.
They have never negotiated in good faith and never will.
They hate the jews more then they love there children
I am sick of there nonsense.

via docstalk.blogspot.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous

Yes, The So-Called "Palestinian Arabs" Are Canaanites

MOLOCH, god of the Canaanites

An "alternative history narrative" has been promoted by Arab propagandists and their fellow-travellers.

The Arabs who reside in the territory of the former Mandate of Palestine, which dissolved on May 15, 1948 after the UN recommended on November 29, 1947 it be partitioned as a Jewish state, and Arab state and a special regime which was rejected by the Arabs, claim to be the direct descendents of the pagan peoples of the Bible who lived in this region 4000 years ago. The ramifications of this are critical to any peace process.

In August 1996, an official "Culture festival" was held at Sebastya (p. 163) with Arab youth dresses as "Canaanites". Others appeared as Girgashites, Ammorites and Perizites, et al.
As explained in this article by David Wenkel who holds a master's degree in Christian thought from Trinity International University in Deerfield, Illinois:
Many Palestinian Arabs, including such prominent figures as Yasir Arafat and Faisal Husseini, claim that Palestinians descended from the Canaanite tribe of the Jebusites. Such declarations should not surprise. History is political. Many Middle Eastern cultures and states retroactively claim roots to the ancient tribes and empires in order to legitimize their modern nationalism...How significant, then, is the Palestinian-Jebusite link? Connections between modern Palestinians and ancient Jebusites would trump the Jewish claim by predating it and legitimize the Palestinian claim to Jerusalem and Israel. The political and diplomatic impact is clear, especially as Palestinian leaders insist that Israel forfeit sovereignty over Jerusalem....

And in further detail:
The claim to Jebusite heritage within the Palestinian community is a recent construct... Andrew S. Buchanan, then a doctoral candidate in international relations from St. Andrews University, Scotland, framed this claim to "uninterrupted continuity" with Jebusites and Canaanites...The Palestinian-Jebusite linkage first appeared in the Arabic literature. Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian activist and historian, wrote that in the mid- or late 1960s, Palestinian nationalism developed a historiography that "anachronistically read back into the history of Palestine over the past few centuries, and even millennia, a nationalist consciousness and identity that are in fact relatively modern." In an accompanying footnote, he wrote that this historical "outlook" created a "predilection for seeing in peoples such as the Canaanites, Jebusites, Amorites, and Philistines the lineal ancestors of the modern Palestinians."...
...the 1978 Al-Mawsu'at Al-Filastinniya (Palestinian encyclopedia)...declared, "The Palestinians [to be] the descendants of the Jebusites, who are of Arab origin," and described Jerusalem as "an Arab city because its first builders were the Canaanite Jebusites, whose descendants are the Palestinians...By 2001, what Khalidi once attributed to anachronistic revisionism, he came to promote when he attached his name to an article published by the American Committee for Jerusalem which declared, without corroborating evidence, that "According to a number of historians and scholars, many of the Arabs of Jerusalem today, indeed the majority of Palestinian Arabs, are descendants of the ancient Jebusites and Canaanites." Khalidi now argued that Palestinians did not descend from those who arrived with Muhammad's armies, but rather, "native Palestinians, both Christian and Muslim Arabs, are of a mixed race whose connection with the land reaches back into very early history."...

PASSIA, an official Arab body, has a rather unique Jerusalem chronology which 'establishes' the Jebusite basis the predates the Jews but also links it to the Arabs by a simple trick: it minimizes and ignores Jewish existence in any form.
(And, by the way, read this dispute.)
I have dealt in a series of posts (here; and here; and here and see other references there) on the "In Canaanite Eyes" theory of Nur Masalha.
But perhaps there is something to all this hocus-pocus. Maybe some Arabs are descended from pagan Canaanites, like those that engaged in human sacrifice. Some dispute that practice. Others do not (and here; and also here; as well as here).
The act of ritual murder committed on the Fogel family in Itamar on Shabbat night was "worthy" of Arabs who champion their Canaanite roots. The barbarism, the immorality, the inherent evil in such an act will forever signify the futility of coexistence and peace with such people.
And the only hope is that they will disappear just as the Canaanite and Jebusite and Ammorite civilizations did.
written by My Right Word

via docstalk.blogspot.com

image via spiritualsatanist.com

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon's posterous