Biden Grudgingly Credits Bush on Success of Iraq Surge

Labels: » » »
The vice president is deeply pained to even minutely acknowledge the Bush administration's success on the Iraq surge strategy.
Of course, security has to precede political accommodation, so Biden's basically skipping over the military component of the Petraeus program. This is the same argument that hardline lefty bloggers made throughout 2007-08, since there was no way they could concede that President Bush not only did the right thing, but had the cojones to do so. Frankly, Biden should be praising the MILITARY component to high heaven, saying that this was 'a big fucking deal." What's even more interesting --- or troubling, if you will --- are these remarks on the continuing challenges:
"The fact of the matter is we're not there yet. We're making significant progress. The only time success will be able to be declared is when the Iraqis form a government and several years from now they are in a position to maintain their own security, they are not a threat to their neighbors, and their economy is growing and prospering. That's when everyone can say it's a success."
Well, if we're that far from being "successful," why in the hell are we pulling out? It's not as if there's a huge political liability here. National security is not the hottest of the hot-button issues this fall, and good money says the economy will still be tops in 2012. And by that time we'd have given the Iraqi forces two more years to consolidate the gains and for the political process to work out. And I'm not just making hay here. See Jennifer Rubin's post from this morning, "Deadlines." President Obama has committed a cardinal sin with respect to our military commitments: He's imposed a firm deadline on the end of military cooperation with the Iraqi government, which could literally blow up in his face --- not to mention the Iraqis' --- should the security situation go south. But I'm sure it'll all be fine. Obama picked Joe Biden as his V.P. running-mate to shore-up his credentials on foreign policy. While the jury's still out on Biden's foreign policy wisdom, he's no slouch on the political hedging end of things. Sheesh. You'd think we had a bunch of rookies in the Situation Room, or something.
this is probably why in the state of Ohio George W Bush would beat Obama in an election. This is significant because it is politically a border state between the two parties. Obviously there were things Bush did right....
and I'm not biased. I (stupidly) did not vote for W Bush... and I really did not like some things about how they planned the invasion of Iraq. I still think they made some mistakes, but he came through.
I will never respect George W Bush for recognizing Palestine however.
...still acknowledging Bush did do the right thing shows a side to Biden that I like. Not because I liked Bush, but because he is talking above politics and being real.
still Biden is a notorious liar and scoundrel. what he did to the Soviet Dissidents in the 70s during the Carter admin is disgusting. but this resolve here shows some growth in his character.
who knows... maybe some day I will make a post about Biden that is similar to the one I just reposted about Bush

Pictures From First Day Of Netanyahu's DC Meeting

Labels: »
The following pictures are from a selection in the flickr account of the Israeli Prime Minister:

The Prime Minister is met by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren


I include the last picture because of something I recall reading during Bibi's first term as Prime Minister. When he came to the US to meet President Clinton for the first time, I recall there was nervousness as to how Bibi would do. 

Someone made a comment regarding when Clinton and Netanyahu exited together--I believe it was after Netanyahu addressed Congress. He was impressed by the fact that when Clinton put his hand around Bibi's shoulder (implying a certain level of dominance) Bibi put his arm around Clinton as well (implying equality).

I was not impressed by the 'insight'
But I remembered it when I saw this picture.
Bibi had better have more than this to keep from getting railroaded by Obama.

fascinating. I saw another picture of Clinton and Bibi and she didn't look friendly. now a second one. Obviously these photos were not taken out of context. I really liked Daled Amos's analysis about the double meaning of putting your arm around someone who is hostile to you. One of my favorite blogs. I steal his stuff all the time because of his insight.

noahdavidsimon's posterous

Poughkeepsie, NY - IBM Unveils Fastest Microprocessor

Labels: »
BM technician Asia Dent tests the world's fastest microprocessor, made in New York and shipping to clients on Sept. 10. The heart of IBM's new zEnterprise System mainframes, the new chip helps deliver world-record speeds of 5.2 GHz.IBM technician Asia Dent tests the world's fastest microprocessor, made in New York and shipping to clients on Sept. 10. The heart of IBM's new zEnterprise System mainframes, the new chip helps deliver world-record speeds of 5.2 GHz.
Poughkeepsie, NY - Got speed?
IBM unveiled details Wednesday about its new advanced chips, which the company says can process information at record-breaking speeds far faster than those in ordinary desktop computers.
The technology giant said it spent more than $1.5 billion on research and development of the new chip tech, which debuts in the form of the 5.2-GHz z196 CPU.
The z196 processor is a four-core chip that contains 1.4 billion transistors on a 512-square millimeter (mm) surface. The chip was designed by IBM engineers in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., and was manufactured using IBM’s 45 nanometer (nm) technology in the company’s fabrication plant in East Fishkill, N.Y.
hope this revives the economy where I live

Optimism for Peace? Hillary Clinton really doesn't seem sincere.

Labels: » »
this is impartial? a picture really is a thousand words.

Jan Brewer: Arizona Fighting to Survive

Labels: » »
This is pretty amazing.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents believe overwhelmingly that their department leadership has become so politicized as to compromise the effectiveness of ICE and the safety of American people. Their union has released a letter announcing its recent unanimous “vote of no confidence” in ICE agency heads, accusing them of “misleading the American public” regarding illegal immigration in order to further a pro-amnesty agenda.

In June, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council — an AFL-CIO affiliate — and affiliated local councils cast a unanimous 259-0 vote of no confidence in ICE Director John Morton and Assistant Director Phyllis Coven. In a letter announcing the vote, the National Council criticized the directors for “misguided and reckless initiatives,” and said their leaders have “abandoned the Agency’s core mission of enforcing United States immigration laws and providing for public safety, and have instead directed their attention to campaigning for policies and programs related to amnesty.”

{Among the claims in the letter]:
Senior ICE leadership dedicates more time to campaigning for immigration reforms aimed at large scale amnesty legislation, than advising the American public and Federal lawmakers on the severity of the illegal immigration problem, and the need for more manpower and resources within the ICE ERO to address it. ICE ERO is currently overwhelmed by the massive criminal alien problem in the United States resulting in the large-scale release of criminals back into local communities.
Kind of puts the Arizona illegal immigration enforcement in perspective, doesn’t it?
While ICE reports internally that more than 90 percent of ICE detainees are first encountered in jails after they are arrested by local police for criminal charges, ICE senior leadership misrepresents this information publicly in order to portray ICE detainees as being non-criminal in nature to support the Administration’s position on amnesty and relaxed security at ICE detention facilities.

The majority of ICE ERO Officers are prohibited from making street arrests or enforcing United States immigration laws outside of the institutional (jail) setting. This has effectively created “amnesty through policy” for anyone illegally in the United States who has not been arrested by another agency for a criminal violation.
Read more at the Washington Examiner
"Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer demanded Friday that a reference to the state's controversial immigration law be removed from a State Department report to the United Nations' human rights commissioner. The U.S. included its legal challenge to the law on a list of ways the federal government is protecting human rights. In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Brewer says it is "downright offensive" that a state law would be included in the report, which was drafted as part of a UN review of human rights in all member nations every four years. "The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to 'review' by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional," Brewer wrote. Arizona's law generally requires police officer enforcing other laws to investigate the immigration status of people they suspect are illegal immigrants. Critics say it would lead officers to target Hispanics. Supporters, including Brewer, say the law prohibits racial profiling and other human rights abuses. The U.S. Justice Department sued to block the measure, arguing federal law trumps the state's authority to enforce immigration laws. A federal judge in July sided with the Justice Department and blocked enforcement of the law's most controversial provisions a day before it was scheduled to take effect. In its report, the State Department does not specifically allege that Arizona's law would lead to racial profiling.
A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world," the report says. "The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."
A State Department spokesman had no immediate comment on Brewer's letter.
Brewer, a Republican, is running for election in November. Her popularity in Arizona and her national profile have soared since she signed the immigration measure in April.
Jan Brewerwhat is even more offensive is that Obama's position of reporting to the United Nations before his own people. Perhaps he should report the position of the Mexican immigration laws in Mexico that are a lot more strict then it's American counterpart.
noahdavidsimon's posterous

Arizona's law generally requires police officer enforcing other laws to investigate the immigration status of people they suspect are illegal immigrants.
Critics say it would lead officers to target Hispanics. Supporters, including Brewer, say the law prohibits racial profiling and other human rights abuses.
The U.S. Justice Department sued to block the measure, arguing federal law trumps the state's authority to enforce immigration laws.

A federal judge in July sided with the Justice Department and blocked enforcement of the law's most controversial provisions a day before it was scheduled to take effect.
In its report, the State Department does not specifically allege that Arizona's law would lead to racial profiling.
"A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world," the report says. "The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."
A State Department spokesman had no immediate comment on Brewer's letter.
Brewer, a Republican, is running for election in November. Her popularity in Arizona and her national profile have soared since she signed the immigration measure in April.

Blaming the victims: The New York Times sick coverage

Labels: »
one wonders how people can read this seriously even if they are supportive of Palestine. How can any one take these editorials seriously? This is not journalism to assume that a family of people that choose to live where they want are guilty and should die because a journalist doesn't like a government. Should we apply that mentality on the N.Y. Times and bomb their building near Times Square?

I had not realized how truly sick the New York Times' coverage of the terror attack was. In the very first paragraph:
The killing of four Israeli settlers, including a pregnant woman, in the West Bank on Tuesday evening rattled Israeli and Palestinian leaders on the eve of peace talks in Washington and underscored the disruptive role that the issue of Jewish settlements could play in the already fragile negotiations.
The New York Times is agreeing with Hamas - Jews living on their historic homeland are the main evil in the Middle East, and this terror attack highlights the "disruptive role" of their communities.
The terror attack itself is not disruptive. Hell, that's expected. If only those uppity Jews would give in to Hamas' reasonable demands to leave or get slaughtered, then peace would reign.
Also, the New York Times highlights the victims as 'settlers' in the first sentence - not Israelis, not civilians, not travelers. No, the NYT defines them in terms of their pejorative term for proud Jews who exercise their free will and choose to live in a place that has the most spiritual meaning for them.

is the New York Times gloating any better then these people below?

3,000 Hamas Supporters Celebrate the Cold-Blooded Murder of Four Jews and a Fetus


Hebron-attack-celebratePalestinians, supporters of the Islamic Hamas  group, raise their right index fingers in the air as a sign of loyalty to the group during a rally, to celebrate a militant attack in the southern West Bank, in the Jebaliya Refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010. A Palestinian gunman opened fire on an Israeli vehicle traveling in the West Bank on Tuesday, killing four passengers, authorities said, in a deadly attack that cast a long shadow over Mideast peace talks set to start this week. AP Photo.
Hebron-attack-celebrate2
A Palestinian boy holding a toy gun is carried by his father as they celebrate the shooting attack in the West Bank, in Jabalya refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip  August 31, 2010. Four Israeli settlers were shot dead in their car in a drive-by attack in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday, on the eve of a U.S.-sponsored Middle East peace summit in Washington. The armed wing of the Islamist Hamas  movement, the Islamist group which controls the Gaza Strip and opposes peace talks, claimed responsibility for the shooting in a statement. Reuters
Hebron-attack-celebrate3
Palestinians celebrate in Jabalya Refugee camp northern Gaza Strip on August 31, 2010 after an attack in Hebron. Four Israelis were shot dead nearby in what police and the military said was a Palestinian ambush, just ahead of renewed peace talks. The military wing of the Islamist Hamas said it was behind the killing of four Israelis in an attack near the West Bank settlement of Kiryat Arba today. Getty Images.
Hebron-attack-celebrate4
Hamas supporters celebrate the shooting attack in the West Bank, in Jabalya refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip, August 31, 2010. Four Israeli settlers were shot dead in their car in a drive-by attack in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday, on the eve of a U.S.-sponsored Middle East peace summit in Washington. The armed wing of the Islamist Hamas movement, the Islamist group which controls the Gaza Strip and opposes peace talks, claimed responsibility for the shooting in a statement. Reuters.
Hebron-attack-celebrate5
Palestinian children, waving green Islamic flags and making a victory sign, participate a rally, to celebrate a militant attack in the southern West Bank, in the Jebaliya Refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010. A Palestinian gunman opened fire on an Israeli vehicle traveling in the West Bank on Tuesday, killing four passengers, authorities said, in a deadly attack that cast a long shadow over Mideast peace talks set to start this week. AP Photo.
Hebron-attack-celebrate6
A Hamas supporter distributes sweets as they celebrate the shooting attack in the West Bank, in Jabalya refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip, August 31, 2010. Four Israeli settlers were shot dead in their car in a drive-by attack in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday, on the eve of a U.S.-sponsored Middle East peace summit in Washington. The armed wing of the Islamist Hamas movement, the Islamist group which controls the Gaza Strip and opposes peace talks, claimed responsibility for the shooting in a statement. Reuters.
JERUSALEM – Palestinian gunmen opened fire Tuesday on an Israeli car in the West Bank and killed four passengers on the eve of a new round of Mideast peace talks in Washington. The Islamic militant group Hamas claimed responsibility.
Assailants firing from a passing car riddled the vehicle with bullets as it traveled near Hebron — a volatile city that has been a flash point of violence in the past. Some 500 ultranationalist Jewish settlers live in heavily fortified enclaves in the city amid more than 100,000 Palestinians.
One of the victims was pregnant, said police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld. Israel's national rescue service said the victims were two men and two women, and Israeli media said everyone in the car was killed.
Video broadcast live on Israel TV late Tuesday showed a white Subaru station wagon standing at an angle at the side of a road, its windows shot out and its doors dotted with bullet holes. The car was flanked by army and police vehicles and dozens of soldiers.
The attackers fled and Israeli forces set up roadblocks and carried out searches to try to catch them.
About 3,000 people joined a rally in Gaza to celebrate the attack. Hamas military wing spokesman Abu Obeida was among them and told The Associated Press: "The Qassam Brigades announces its full responsibility for the heroic operation in Hebron."

We are not SUCKERS!

Labels: » »

Khaibar is an ancient town on the Arabian Peninsula. In 629, Mohammad’s soldiers attacked the Jews barricaded in the city. A year earlier, Mohammad signed the Treaty of Hudaybiyya with the Jews, promising them to live in peace while telling his followers this was the right path: Sign agreements when the Jewish enemy is strong and bide your time.

When Mohammad conquered Khaibar, he executed all the men, the women (including the girls) were brutally raped, and boys were sold to slavery. This event was deeply etched in Islamic imperialism’s consciousness, and the song “Khaibar, Khaibar, oh Jews, Mohammad’s army shall return” has been used as a battle cry since 629 and until the Mavi Marmara days.
they just do it again... and again... and again 
Muhammad, the prophet of Islam and the apostle of Allah, had
ordered at least 60 raids and wars often involving massacres and personally participated in 27 of them. The exemplary example and the perfection of
humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct
that he was—Muhammad massacred, beheaded, tortured, terrorized,
raped, and looted in the name of God. Described below  are
three of his massacres and a partial listing of his sex-slaves from the Muslim holy books and Islamic
writings.
  • In the Massacre of Banu Quraiza, Muhammad order the beheading
    of 600 to 900 adult men (determined by pubic-hair growth) and he
    himself chopped off a few heads. He enslaved all the women and
    children of the Jewish tribe. The women were kept as sex-slaves
    with Muhammad himself taking a beautiful Jewish woman as his own
    sex-slave and sold the rest of the captives into slavery. He also
    looted the property of the murdered Jews and took possession of
    all their wealth and properties. Allah, like a godfather and mafia
    chieftain of the Muhammad's criminal gang, rejoiced this barbarous
    and heinous acts of slaughtering the Jews and enslavement of their
    women and children by creating 5 teachings in the Koran as the
    Eternal Laws of God.

  • At the Massacre of Khaybar, Muhammad brutally tortured a
    Jewish chieftain for extracting information about where he had
    hidden his treasures. When the treasure was uncovered, the
    chieftain was beheaded. This chieftain was the husband of the most
    beautiful Jewish woman of Khaybar, the 17-year-old Safiyaah.
    Safiyaah's family members had been annihilated by Muhammad at the
    Banu Qurayza massacre. Now having beheaded her husband, the
    Prophet took Safiyah as his sex-slave and copulated on the same
    night.

  • In the massacre of the Jewish Settlement of Bani Mustaliq,
    Muhammad captured their women and took twenty-year-old Jewish
    girl, Juwayriya as his sex-slave.


THE MASSACRE OF BANU QURAIZA

Angel Gabriel Appears To Muhammad And Orders Him To Attack The
Rich Jewish Settlement Of Banu Quraiza

Sahi Bukhari :Volume 5, Book 59, Number 443:

Narrated 'Aisha:

When the Prophet returned from the battle of Al-Khandaq (i.e.
Trench) and laid down his arms and took a bath, Gabriel came and
said (to the Prophet), “you have laid down your arms? By Allah, we
angels have not laid them down yet. So set out for them." The
Prophet said, "Where to go?" Gabriel said, "Towards this side,"
pointing towards Banu Quraiza. So the Prophet went out towards
them. (Book 019, Number 4368)


Sahi Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 444:

Narrated Anas:

“As if I am just now looking at the dust rising in the street of
Banu Ghanm (in Medina) because of the marching of Gabriel's
regiment when Allah's Apostle set out to Banu Quraiza (to attack
them).”

These traditions about Gabriel's leadership are designed to give
divine support for the atrocity that Muhammad was about to be unleashed
upon Banu Qurayza.
Today, we may see this as fanciful, but to millions of Muslims this
is real and divine.



Muhammad Besieges Banu Quraiza For 25 Days. After The Jews
Unconditionally Surrender All Men Are Beheaded, Women and Young
Girls Raped and Sold into Slavery. Their Property was Looted.

Sahi Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 448

So Allah's Apostle went to them (i.e. Banu Quraiza) (i.e. besieged
them). They then surrendered to the Prophet's judgment
(unconditionally after 25 days of fierce resistance) but he
directed them to Sad (ally) to give his verdict concerning them.
Sad said, "I give my judgment that their warriors should be
killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and
their properties distributed."

The Prophet said, "You have judged according to the King's
(Allah's) judgment." (Hadith No. 447, Vol. 5)

The sentence was Death by decapitation for around 300—600 men and
pubescent boys, and enslavement for the women and children. Ibn
Ishaq says that the number may have been as high as 800—900 (p.
464).

The text of Sirat [Ibn Ishaq, page 464]:

Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina
in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the
apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its
market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and
struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out
to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b.
Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all,
though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were
being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka`b what he
thought would be done with them. He replied, 'Will you never
understand? Don't you see that the summoner never stops and those
who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!' This went
on until the apostle made an end of them.

Huyayy was brought out wearing a flowered robe in which he had
made holes about the size of the finger-tips in every part so that
it should not be taken from him as spoil, with his hands bound to
his neck by a rope. When he saw the apostle he said, 'By God, I do
not blame myself for opposing you, but he who forsakes God will be
forsaken.' Then he went to the men and said, 'God's command is
right. A book and a decree, and massacre have been written against
the Sons of Israel.' Then he sat down and his head was struck off.

Muhammad ordered and participated in the digging of the trench
into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. He STRUCK OFF the
heads of at least two of those captives.

 

How Did The SS Jihadist Executioners Decide on Which Jewish
Boys To Slaughter Or Leave Alive To Be Sold Into Slavery

To separate the young Jewish men from the minors, Muhammad
ordered that their pants be pulled down and the youngsters genital
area examined SS style for pubic hairs and if they had grown any
pubic hair, it was enough to behead them.

Book 38, Number 4390:

Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:

I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions)
examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were
killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those
who had not grown hair.



Aisha's Description of the Only Woman Murdered: She was
Delirious Because Her Husband Had Just Been Beheaded. She was taken
by the SS Jihadist and Beheaded.

Book 14, Number 2665:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:

No woman of Banu Qurayzah was killed except one. She was with me,
talking and laughing on her back and belly (extremely), while the
Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) was killing her people with
the swords. Suddenly a man called her name: Where is so-and-so? I
asked: What is the matter with you? She said: I did a new act. The
man took her and beheaded her. I will not forget that she was
laughing extremely although she knew that she would be killed.



Muhammad Took One Of The Jewish Women As His Sex-slave

The apostle had chosen one of their women for himself, Rayhana
bint Amr . . . one of the women of . . . Qurayza, and she remained
with him until she died, in his power. The apostle had proposed to
marry and put a veil on her, but she said: "Nay, leave me in your
power, for that will be easier for me and for you." So he left
her. She had shown repugnance towards Islam when she was captured
and clung to Judaism. (Ibn Ishaq p. 466)



The Looted Property And The Jewish Women And Children Were
Divided Among the Muslims

More specifically, Ibn Ishaq says the spoils were divided among
the Muslims thus:

Then the apostle divided the property, wives, and children . .
. among the Muslims, and he made known on that day the shares of
horse and men, and took out the fifth. A horseman got three
shares, two for the horse and one for the rider. A man without a
horse got one share (p. 466). Then the apostle sent Sa'd b. Zayd
al-Ansari brother of b. 'Abdu'l-Ashhal with some of the captive
women of B. Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and
weapons. [page 466]


Allah Allows Muhammad and His Jihadists To Have Sex With Their
Sex-slaves

Allah also allows jihadists to have sex with female slaves.
Sources: Ibn Ishaq, pp. 464-66; Tabari, vol. 8, pp. 27-41.

Muhammad Enriches Himself

Muhammad had captured huge spoils from his "final solution” of
Jews of Banu Qurayza. Muhammad gets one-fifth of the Jewish
property (movable, immovable and human), and his jihadist followers
get the rest. The tribe of Banu Qurayza likely consisted of about
500 families, who were wealthiest in Medina. Therefore, Muhammad
enriched himself with the wealth of about 100 rich families as well as
their women and children from this single act of successful Jihad.

Here is how Allah sanctions the enrichment of Muhammad and his
Jihadist followers from his expedition:

Quran-8:41— “And know that out of all the booty that ye may
acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the
Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the
wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent
down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting
of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.



Why Does Muhammad Not Show Mercy?

It is Allah who guides Muhammad into committing these heinous,
barbaric cruelty against the people of Arabia. Below are a list of
Allah's commands to Muhammad to carry out those acts of carnage:

Allah celebrates this slaughter and enslavement of the Jews in
the Koran:

Quran-33:25- “Allah turned back the unbelievers [Meccans and
their allies] in a state of rage, having not won any good, and
Allah spared the believers battle. Allah is, indeed, Strong and
Mighty.”

Quran-33:26- “And He brought those of the People of the Book
[Jewish people of Banu Qurayza] who supported them from their
fortresses and cast terror into their hearts, some of them you
slew (beheaded) and some you took prisoners (captive)”

Quran-33:27- “And He made you heirs of their lands, their
houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented
(before). And Allah has power over all things.” [Merciful Allah
asked Prophet Muhammad to confiscate entire properties of
surrendered Jews]

Quran-8:67—“It is not fitting for an Apostle that he should
have prisoners of war until He thoroughly subdued the land….”
(Allah insisting Prophet to kill all the prisoners, and should not
keep any surrendered prisoners alive until He (Prophet) occupied
entire Arabia.”

Quran-8:17—It is not ye who Slew them; it is God; when thou
threwest a handful of dust, it was not Thy act, but God’s…..”
(Allah said, the killing of surrendered soldiers were done by the
wish of Allah)

These above Quranic verses revealed some unpleasant truths:

The verses: 33:25-27 were revealed to describe Banu Qurayza
incident and clearly talking about the unbelievers (Quresh pagans,
and their allies Jews of Banu Quraiza).  Specifically, verse-33:27 talks
of ow by the judgement of Sa’d ibn Muaz all the men were slaughtered and women
and children were captivated. And Jewish land and property were
taken as Booty….Sa’d delivered his justice according to Bible; hence
Muhammad said—“your judgement was like God.”

Allah permitted the enslavement and beheading of Jews, so any
Muslim familiar with the background of this verse knows that
beheading as such has been assimilated into the Quran.

What is so troubling about the verse 33:26 is that Allah
(Himself) celebrates the "terror" that He threw into the Jews’
hearts. Indeed, when Abu Lubabah the mediator approached the Jews
during negotiations, the women and children were crying. Allah of
course had heavily terrorized them.

The Prophet Muhammad had already expelled two other Jewish tribes
(Qaynuqa and Nadir) from Medina, and the Banu Qurayza Jews begged
for for the same punishment to them. But the Islam's prophet of
peace and mercy declined this relatively more merciful and humane
option.

Such a heartless, evil incarnate was the prophet of Islam!


THE CONQUEST AND MASSACRE OF KHAYBAR

Muhammad Attacks The Rich Jewish Settlement of Khaybar Without
Warning and Takes Safiya As His Sex Slave After Murdering Her
Husband


Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:

Narrated by Anas:

The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaybar when it was
still dark and then said, "Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for
whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will
be the morning for those who have been warned." Then the
inhabitants of Khaybar came out running on the roads. The Prophet
had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as
captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the
share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet .
The Prophet made her manumission as her 'Mahr'. Muhammad was sixty
(60) when he married Safiyyahh, a young girl of seventeen. She
became his eighth wife.



Distribution Of War Booty In Khaybar:

Sahi Buchari Hadiths #143, page-700:

Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, “in the war
of Khayber after the inhabitants of Banu Nadir were surrendered,
Allah’s apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet)
took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal)..
Among the captives Safiyya Bint Huyy Akhtab was taken by Allah’s
Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom
was her Mahr.”

At first Dihyah al-Kalbi, a Muslim Jihadist asked for Safiyyah.
But when Muhammad saw her exquisite beauty, he chose her for
himself and gave her two cousins to Dihyah.

 

Muhammad Horribly Tortured Safiya's Husband To Get Information
About His Hidden Gold Treasure. He Was Beheaded After He Refused To
Give Up The Treasure.

Prophet Muhammad accused Safiyyah's husband Kinanah of hiding
wealth, which he had received during his marriage with Safiyyah. A renegade Jew divulged the secret of Kinanah's hidden
gold treasures to Muhammad. Kinanah and his cousin were captured and tortured by
Muhammad to extract information about the whereabouts of his
treasures. He was tormented by branding his chest with a heated
stake and then he was beheaded in Islamic style.

Sourcing Ibn Ishak, Tabari writes:

'Kinanah b. al-Rabi b. al-Huqyaq who had the treasure of B. Nadir
was brought to the Messenger of God, who questioned him; but he
denied knowing where it was. Then the messenger of God was brought
a Jew who said to him, "I have seen Kinanah walk around this ruin
every morning." The Messenger of God said to Kinanah: "What do you
say? If we find it in your possession, I will kill you." "All
right," he answered. The Messenger of God commanded that the ruin
should be dug up, and some of the treasure was extracted from it.
Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender
it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr
b. al-'Awwam, saying, "torture him until you root out what he
has." Al-Zubayr kept twirling his firestick in his breast until
Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to
Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother
Mahmud b. Maslamah."'



The Looted Property And Women And Children Were Distributed Among
The Jihadists:

Muhammad now allowed the Muslim Jihadists to take possession of
the women and children of the Jews of Khaybar.

Allah’s Messenger occupied the Jewish land:

Sahih Muslim writes:Book 010, Number 3759:

Ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Allah's Messenger
(may peace be upon him) handed over the land of Khaibar (on the
condition) of the share of produce of fruits and harvest, and he
also gave to his wives every year one hundred wasqs: eighty wasqs
of dates and twenty wasqs of barley. When 'Umar became the caliph
he distributed the (lands and trees) of Khaibar, and gave option
to the wives of Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) to earmark
for themselves the land and water or stick to the wasqs (that they
got) every year. They differed in this matter. Some of them opted
for land and water, and some of them opted for wasqs every year. 'A'isha
and Hafsa were among those who opted for land and water.

Enjoying special Booty (Gani-maater-maal): Muhammad Takes Safiya
As Booty To Be His Sex Slave

Safiya bint Huyai/Huyayy was a captive Mohammed married after
slaughtering her father, brother, husband and the men at Khaibar,
according to Bukhari vol.2 book 14 ch.5 no.68 p.35; vol.4 book 52
ch.74 no.143 p.92; vol.4 book 52 ch.168 no.280 p.175 and Tabari
vol.39 p.185.



Muhammad at 60 Takes 17-Year-Old Safiyah as Sex-slave

After securing beautiful Safiyaah daughter of Huyayy for himself,
Prophet Muhammad bedded her in his tent on the same night. Here is
the story: Merciful Prophet asked Bilal, the Negro crier
of prayer to fetch Safiyyah to his (Muhammad's) camp. Bilal brought
Safiyyah and her cousin straight across the battlefield strewn with
dead-bodies, passing by the corpses of Kinana and his cousin. The
two cousins of Safiyyah shrieked in horror when they
witnessed the gruesome scene of the dead-bodies of their dear and
near relatives. When brought to his presence, Muhammad cast his
mantle around Safiyyah indicating that she was to be his own.
Muhammad consoled a frustrated Dhiya by giving him Safiyyah's cousin
sisters. According to Ibn Sa'd Prophet Muhammad purchased Safiyyah
from Dhiyah for seven camels. On the same night, Muhammad took
Safiyyah to bed. This was, of course, an exemplary  character
of the holy Prophet of Islam!

Here is what Ibn Sa'd writes:

"-.when it was night, he entered a tent and she entered with
him. Abu Ayyub came there and passed the night by the tent with a
sword keeping his head at the tent. When it was morning and the
Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him.”

To hide the lascivious character of Muhammad, Muslim biographers
often mention that he married Safiyyahh before he slept with her.
But they forget to mention that Muhammad did not follow the rule of
waiting period (three monthly periods) to sleep with Safiyyahh. He
slept with her the same day she was captured.



Islamic Intolerance: Kill All The Jews: The First Final Solution

  • Book 019, Number 4366:

    It has been narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the
    Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: “I will expel the
    Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave
    any but Muslim.” [This single sahi hadiths tells everything about
    Islamic intolerance]

     
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176 Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar:

    Allah's Apostle said, "You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews
    till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray
    them) saying, 'O 'Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew
    hiding behind me; so kill him.' "

     
  • “the Apostle of Allah said, 'Kill any Jew that falls into your
    power.” [Ibn Ishaq, Siratul Rasul, v. 553]



THE MASSACRE OF BANU MUSTALIQ

Muhammad Attacks The Jewish Settlement of Banu Mustaliq: He
Captures And Rapes A Twenty Year Old Jewish Girl - Juwairiya

Bukhari yol 3,Book46, No. 717

"Narrated Ibn Aun:

Prophet had suddenly attacked Banu Mustaliq without warning while
they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the
places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women
and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on
that day and raped her.

Juwairiya bint Harith/al-Harith was a captive in this raid, [Bukhari 3.46.13.717, p431-432]. Sahih Muslim 2.2349, p.520 says
that Mohammed attacked the Banu Mustaliq tribe without any warning
while they were heedlessly grazing their cattle. Juwairiya was a
daughter of the chief. Sahih Muslim 3.4292, p.942 and Abu Dawud 2.227,
p728 and al-Tabari 39, p.182-183 also say Juwairiya/Juwairiyyah was captured in a raid on the Banu Mustaliq
tribe. She had been married to Musafi’ bin Safwan, who was killed in
battle.

Juwayriyyah bint al-Harith bin Abi Birar bin Habib, great
grandson of Jadhimah al-Mustaliq of the Khuza’ah group, was taken as
booty when Muslims raided the al-Mustaliq tribe. Her husband, Musafi’
bin Safwan Dhu al-Shuir bin Abi Asrb bin Malik bin Jadhimah was
killed in the battle. She was a prisoner of war who agreed to marry
Mohammed. al-Tabari 39:p182-183; al-Tabari 9:p133.

Juwayriyya married Mohammed when she was 20 years old. al-Tabari 39:p184.



SEX SLAVES: MUHAMMAD AND THOSE HIS RIGHT HAND POSSESSES

  • Sahih Bukhari: Volume 9, Book 93, Number 506:

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:

    That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims)
    captured some females and intended to have sexual relation with
    them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about
    coitus interrupt us. The Prophet said, "It is better that you
    should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create
    till the Day of Resurrection." Qaza'a said, "I heard Abu Sa'id
    saying that the Prophet said, 'No soul is ordained to be created
    but Allah will create it."

     
  • Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 337:

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him):
    O Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon
    him) mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with
    Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the
    Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we
    desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives,
    (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we
    decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl
    (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to
    avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas
    Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked
    Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does
    not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born
    up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.


  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2166:

    Narrated AbuSa'id al-Khudri:

    A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw
    the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that
    she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men
    intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is
    burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said:
    The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot
    turn it away.

From Quran, "…abstain from sex, except with those joined to them
in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands
possess - for (in their case) they are free from blame," Sura
23:5-6. See also Sura 4:24

"He [Mohammed] replied, ‘Conceal your private parts except from
your wife and from whom your right hands possess (slave-girls).’"
[Abu Dawud vol.3, no.4006, p.1123.]

Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4443-4445 p.1244 shows that having sex with a
slave-girl a man owns is fine.

As was typical of wealthy Arab men, Mohammed apparently had need
of a few slave girls too. See Bukhari vol.7 book 64 ch.6 no.274
p.210.

Mohammed briefly had a "very beautiful" captive before he gave
her to Mahmiyah b. Jaz’ al-Zubaydi. al-Tabari vol.8 p.151

One of the slave girls belonging to Mohammed house committed
fornication with someone else. It is the "someone else" part that
was a problem. Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4458 p.1249

Mohammed called a black slave-girl to come and conceal Abu Dharr
behind a curtain while he was taking a bath. Abu Dawud vol.1 no.332
p.87

Mention Umm Ayman (=Barakah), a client (slave-girl) of the
prophet. al-Tabari vol.39 p.287

In general, Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4443-4445 p.1244 teaches that
having sex with a slave-girl a man owns is OK.

But, having sex with a wife’s slave girl is OK if the wife made
her lawful for him. Note that he did not have to be married to the
slave girl. Ibn-i-Majah vol.4 no.2551 p.12

Mohammed "had intercourse with her [Mary] by virtue of her being
his property." al-Tabari vol.39, p194. Footnote 845 explains, "That
is, Mariyah was ordered to veil herself as did the Prophet’s wives,
but he did not marry her."



CONCLUSION

Muhammad's unprovoked, murderous attacks of Jewish tribes
described above are acts of utter barbarity. His extermination and
genocide of the whole community, such as that of Banu Qurayza, makes
it worse.

His institution of slavery as a divine order of society was one
of the worst curse that could happen to humanity. Allowing sex
with slave-girls made it worse. His trading of slaves, such as selling
some Banu Qurayza captives in Nejd, was another evil institution.

Muhammad engaged in all these cruel, dehumanizing and horrible acts  with the divine sanctions of Allah. Muhammad and his brainchild
Allah were the worst evils to befall humankind, the detriment of
which continues to afflict humanity with no end in site.

YouTube Jihad: American Terror Imam Radicalizing Muslim Youth Online

Labels:
it might be a good idea to support the Jewish Internet Defense Force. People don't give David Appletree enough credit. He pioneered this fight.

He may be playing hide-and-seek from drone missiles in the caves of Yemen, but Al Qaeda cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki is still attempting to poison the minds of young Muslim Americans through the use of YouTube and other social media.
The extent of Al-Awlaki's reach on the internet is outlined in a new report released by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) on Aug. 28. The report describes the millions of views garnered by Al-Awlaki's YouTube video clips and the online networking of his rabid fan base.
A former imam at the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Virginia, the American-born Al-Awlaki has increasingly been using social media as a recruiting method for would-be jihadists, leading terrorist watchers to dub him the "[Osama] bin Laden of the internet" and the "sheikh of YouTube." Al-Awlaki has been tied to the Sept. 11 hijackers, the Christmas Day bomber and the Fort Hood shooter. This past spring, President Obama ordered that the cleric be killed on sight, but the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit on Aug. 30 to prevent the military from targeting the U.S. citizen without a trial.
According to MEMRI, after Al-Awlaki's personal website was shuttered in 2009, YouTube became the "largest clearinghouse of his online videos."
"A quick tabulation of viewings of Al-Awlaki's 2,500-plus clips - comprising lectures, sermons, and compilation videos supporting his jihadist philosophy - now indicates well over three million views, and counting," MEMRI reported. "These clips include Al-Awlaki calling Muslims to jihad, expressions of support for martyrdom attacks, and encouragement to kill American soldiers."
Al-Awlaki has even begun posting his recruitment videos directly to YouTube, as opposed to the radical Islamist websites that normally host those types of clips. A search for "Al Awlaki" on YouTube turns up 4,600 results, These videos are publicly accessible, and can easily be viewed by children.
In one extreme case, a young American Muslim follower of Al-Awlaki created a "Jihadi Fan Club" page on YouTube, which MEMRI called "a clear example of a young American convert radicalized by YouTube."
"Anwar Al-Awlaki is NOT a terrorist. He simply wants America to change its unjust foreign policy," wrote Jihadi Fan Club on his YouTube page. "He does NOT call for fighting out of hatred for America, he call for fighting in the name of self defense. Anwar Al-Awlaki tells the sincere Muslims to fight against the U.S. troops and all the oppressors of the Muslims."
Underneath one video in support of the Ground Zero mosque, Jihadi Fan Club posted a shout-out to Al-Awlaki and Abu Monsour Al-Amriki - an American-born member of terror group Al-Shabab who posts his own rap videos endorsing jihad on YouTube - thanking the terrorists for their "inspiration."
In another post, Jihad Fan Club argued that the Americans murdered on Sept. 11 were not innocent civilians, and that they deserved the attack because they supported the U.S. economic and foreign policies.
"[P]eople want to say, 'Well, the people who did 9/11, they attacked innocent people.' Well not necessarily; you pretend like the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was a daycare center or a maternity ward. No. The World Trade Center was the epicenter of American economy that funds so much death and destruction in the Muslim world," wrote Jihad Fan Club under a video expressing support for the Sept. 11 attacks. "If the people who did 9/11 wanted to kill innocent people, they would have bombed a school, they would have bombed a church, they would have bombed a daycare center, they would have bombed a grocery store."
Underneath a video of a CNN news program, Jihad Fan Club wrote that "Muslim lap dogs" are trying to trick other Muslims into condemning terrorism and being kind to non-Muslims.
"Killing the innocent is WORNG [sic], but CNN has an EVIL agenda which is to trick you into thinking that terrorism is caused by misguided Muslims instead of U.S. foreign policy," wrote Jihad Fan Club. "They also want you to spend your time condemning terrorist attacks instead of using your power to fight against the American government, its puppet regimes and its allies which is the cause of all the violence in the Muslim world and the terror attacks in the US & Canada. Oh Muslims please do not be fooled by these evil disbelievers and their Muslim lap dogs. A real Muslim is always harsh towards the non Muslims and lenient towards the Muslims."
Jihad Fan Club's page also features videos by the American-born Al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn, and praise for terror leader Osama bin Laden.
Al-Awlaki's use of the internet as a recruiting tool is noteworthy, especially because of the success the cleric has had at recruiting and inspiring American-grown terrorists in the past.
MEMRI lists more than a dozen terrorist suspects that were radicalized through Al-Awlaki's online presence, including Paul and Nadia Rockwood (an Alaskan couple who made a "hit-list" of U.S. officials who "desecrated Islam"), Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan, Time Square bomber Faisal Shahzad, and Sharif Mobley (a 24-year old American who is charged with killing a Yemeni soldier).
Al-Awlaki was also a spiritual adviser to two of the Sept. 11 hijackers and Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
But MEMRI noted that the jihadist infiltration of YouTube is unlikely to end soon.
"[A]s Western governments increasingly take down and interfere with traditional terrorist websites, Al-Qaeda and other jihadists have grown more dependent upon on YouTube and other social media outlets, including Facebook and Twitter. To date, these outlets seem unprepared to effectively address this problem," the group reported.
According to YouTube's "Community Guidelines," hate speech is not permitted on the website.
"We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view. But we don't permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, and sexual orientation/gender identity)," reads the Community Guidelines.
A spokeswoman for YouTube told the Media Research Center that "Because it is difficult to verify the identity of users who post videos...an individual who claims to be a member of a terrorist organization (a claim we may not be able to verify) but who posts videos and comments that comply with the rules, may not be suspended from the site."
However, she said that users who "encourage others to commit specific, serious acts of violence, with or without claiming membership in a terrorist group, would be in violation of our policies."
One of the reasons why YouTube has difficult time addressing the problem of terrorist videos on the site may be because the enormous number of videos uploaded each day makes it nearly impossible to review and approve each one individually.
"Every minute, 24 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube, totaling hundreds of thousands of videos every day.  To be able to offer YouTube at this scale, we cannot review content before it goes live," said the spokeswoman.
This isn't the first time that YouTube has been cited for having controversial content on its site. A Media Research Center special report found that the website features thousands of sexually explicit videos, including soft-core porn, and is often used by porn producers to drive traffic to their X-rated websites.

Israel Says It’s Ready to Divide Jerusalem…

Labels: »
Huh?…
JERUSALEM, Sept. 1 (UPI) In the framework of a peace deal with the Palestinians, Israel is willing to partition Jerusalem, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said.
In an interview with Haaretz newspaper Wednesday, Barak said while the gaps remain wide and are of a “fundamental nature,” he believes there is a real chance to achieve peace with the Palestinians, based on a two-state solution and the division of Jerusalem.
“I’m not saying that there is a certainty for success, but there is a chance. This chance must be exploited to the fullest,” he told the newspaper.
Outlining the principles of a peace deal, the Israeli defense minister revealed his vision concerning Israel’s capital city.
“West Jerusalem and 12 Jewish neighborhoods that are home to 200,000 residents will be ours. The Arab neighborhoods in which close to a quarter million Palestinians live will be theirs. There will be a special regime in place along with agreed upon arrangements in the Old City, the Mount of Olives and the City of David.”
The conclusion of talks he said must achieve two states for two nations, an end to the conflict and the end of all future demands. The demarcation of a border that will run inside Israel where a solid Jewish majority will remain for generations, and on the other side a demilitarized Palestinian state, he said. Comprehensive security arrangements must also be made, he added.
The future Palestinian state must be viable politically, economically and territorially, he said.
All the settlement blocs will remain in Israel’s hands and isolated settlements will be relocated into the larger blocs or inside Israel, he said.
...um... this isn't Bibi talking though. this is the guy who already offered this and isn't a leader anymore

Get Your Fucking Hand Off Me!

Labels:

You just know that's what he was thinking.

Popular Analysis