In an update to the Reuters story noted in our previous post, Reuters writes:
So, there is no dispute that both UNIFIL and the Lebanese army had been notified of the maintenance work in advance. Given that UNIFIL is based on the Lebanese side of the border, how exactly would routine maintenance work on the Israeli side of the border be under UNIFIL "supervision"? Moreover, the photographic evidence demonstrates that UNIFIL soldiers were embedded with the Lebanese army and carefully observing the Israeli maintenance activity at the time of the attack.A Lebanese army official said the military had had prior notice of Israel's planned activity but it had been agreed on condition that it took place under UNIFIL's supervision, adding that said the Israelis had gone ahead without this.
Reuters then sneaks in a suggestion:
No, and it didn't say whether Castro had Kennedy killed either. The UNIFIL statement speaks for itself; it didn't say whether the Israeli army had coordinated with the peacekeepers because the assertion that this had been agreed has no basis in reality. It is simply a red herring tossed in by the Lebanese army to draw attention away from its own culpability.The UNIFIL statement did not say whether the Israeli army had coordinated with the peacekeepers.
And Reuters of course, happily takes the bait and feeds it to its readers.



Opening Tuesday's World News with the workplace shooting in Manchester, Connecticut, anchor Diane Sawyer saw it as one in a long line of incidents involving a “worker with a gun and grudge” as she described the nine killed as “the worst rampage since 13 were killed last November at Fort Hood, Texas.”