My Photos in Everybody Draw Mohammed Day

Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil -Thomas Mann

I suggest people look up Mohammad Amin al-Husayni before debating further. Ask yourself does Fatah recognize the Holocaust? and why not? the answer is because the root of the creation of the so called Palestinian people is part of the "Final Solution". The Holocaust against the Jews never stopped, it merely changed it's language and created a fictional identity. Jerusalem is not a holy city in the works of Mohammad. In fact there was never a Mosque in Jerusalem during his lifetime. This is historical fact. The entire recreation of history is merely an attack on Jews. Since http://xrl.us/Islamic doctrine has more violence in it then the works of Adolf Hitler this is not a surprise that they would revision such things. "The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).

via facebook.com

Why wasn't hanging judge #Goldstone exposed sooner?

via israelmatzav.blogspot.com

In Boston's Jewish Advocate, Charles Jacobs criticizes Israel for not bringing to light sooner Richard Goldstone's record as a 'hanging judge' in South Africa (full article available here).

Surely the Israelis must have known this last fall when he issued his holier-than-thou condemnation of the Gaza incursion. Yet the Jews pulled their punches, as they always seem to do. And that's why we're always getting decked in the public arena.
We can spend hours debating about the "context" - whether Goldstone had been a willing tool of the apartheid regime or, as his apologists explain, he actually tried to be a monkey wrench. Doesn't matter. What counts is that he sentenced to death 29 blacks in a court system that was anything but color blind. What counts is that he didn't put the Israeli actions "in context."

The denied correlative is that bloggers were pointing fingers at Goldstone's past, but focused on his message because Israel's enemies are always from dubious histories. How could any publication possibly keep up with all the misdeeds of Palestinian sympathizers? Should every mention of Abbas be a reminder that he is a Holocaust denier and then just ignore him and anyone who associates with him? I sure think so, but in the court of global opinion people will give the Holocaust denier Abbas a soapbox, so it becomes necessary to pretend that the hypocrisy is not there when it becomes glaring. The U.N. in a nutshell is a joke.

I was talking about Goldstone's history as a judge in South Africa on this blog because of Israel Matzav
 

J Rats

Freedom has become a very loose term, now used by the Left to attack every principle of our free society.It is now clear that the degenerate Israeli, mostly the Leftist, "progressive," elite academia is on rampage to attack the country from which it operates.

The worst case is when Jews go against other Jews . I call such doubtful Jews, unJews.

The unJew organizations, such as J Street and J-Call as well as individuals such as Shlomo Sand, Neve Gordon, and Gershon Baskin, Tel Aviv University president, Professor Joseph Klafter and the like, can all be lumped into one new "J" name, this time, "J Rats", a name derives from the derogative term Judenrat.

For those who are not familiar with the meaning of the term Judenrat, plural Judenräte, in the German language its meaning is "Jewish council." These were administrative bodies Nazi Germans required of the Jews to form in the German occupied territory of Poland and later in the occupied territories of the Russia/Soviet Union. The Judenrat served as a liaison between the Nazi German occupying authorities and the Jewish communities under occupation. The Judenrat operated pre-existing Jewish communal properties such as hospitals, soup kitchens, day care centers, and vocational schools. Though in a number of cases, such as the Minsk Ghetto and Lachwa Ghetto, Judenrats cooperated with the Resistance Movement, in most other cases, Judenrats collaborated with the Nazis, on the basis that cooperation might save the lives of the ghetto inhabitants, more so to save their lives only. Therefore, the word Judenrat attained derogative connotation.

In their false claim to be helping the State of Israel, or along their thinking that the State should adopt their suggested policy, J-Rats collaborate with and aid and abet Israel's enemies. Such ongoing efforts subvert the State and derail its sovereignty.

Nurit Greenger May 19, 2010 via docstalk.blogspot.com

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon's posterous

The Russian Game

The 47-year-old Kasparov, born Garry Weinstein to an Armenian mother and a Jewish father and widely considered the greatest chess player of all time, urged the West to tackle Putin via a list of oligarchs who he said acted as his “wallet” and against whom, he said, there was no shortage of evidence of financial wrongdoing.  via jpost.com Kasparov made a short-lived bid to challenge for the Russian presidency and was arrested and briefly jailed in recent years after anti-Putin protests.

It's incredible how much influence a Russian chessmaster has in politics.  I would have to agree that all leaders should be masters of the great strategic language of sixty four squares, but sadly it is never enough if one can not see beyond the cold blooded code of game theory.  Bobby Fisher certainly is no example of balance and reason, but Kasparov the grandmaster who broke with the Socialists feels that Russia is being hurt by it's own actions and feels that it's totalitarian but very profitable tendencies will in the end drive it's Asian connections away because the Asians will begin to see Russia as an aggressive bear.

Kasparov: It is simply not correct to link the level of democracy to prosperity. It is absolutely clear that the economic wealth of Saudi Arabia exceeds the performance of the Czech Republic. But apparently democracy is quite stable in the Czech Republic, which cannot be said about Saudi Arabia. As we delve into the past, we must not forget about the existing model of society. If we look at statistical data, we see that Protestant countries in terms of economic development are more successful than those observing Catholicism. There is coherence, after all, among different societal factors. Most likely, the system of mutual relations that has evolved in Eastern Europe and Asia corresponds to another level of governance. via rferl.org

Essentially Kasparov clarifies that freedom and profit do not go hand in hand and that Americans must realize that cost benefit analysis will lead to more of the same.

When Kasparov compares Catholicism and Protestant systems he is alluding to free capital.  The Catholic church has been traditionally hostile to interest and banking.  (hence the Catholic's world dependence on Jews to fill the need to make their society sustainable and at the same time burden Jews with the role.  Same thing as Islamic society and Orthodox Christians such as Russian Orthodoxy.  Religious hostility to profit from banks is what leads to a condemned class of wealthy mercantilism.  It is the root of a black market and it is not exclusive to  Religion.  The same black market exists in other ideologies like socialism.  Hostility to banking causes a despised mercantile class that is rich, because Capitalism is natural and denying nature merely creates a fetish.

...Sticking to the current form of governance, which is to say guaranteeing the survival of Putin's regime, will necessarily lead to the demise of Russia within its present borders.  The Far East and Eastern Siberia are already developing according to a Chinese scenario, the full scope of which will be revealed in the near future. In the next 10 to 15 years, a lot of Russian territories will become at least de facto Chinese. This will change the situation in Russia fundamentally.

Furthermore, the situation in the North Caucasus is rather unstable. Mutual relations and the cooperation between Putin and [Ramzan] Kadyrov, the high price that has been paid to buy the loyalty of the local elite through an enormous tribute of multibillion[-ruble] investments, all this cannot be an arrangement for good. The situation in the region can easily get out of control if the capital inflow is interrupted. It is apparent, even when leaving democratic institutions and values aside for a moment, that Putin's regime has led the country down a blind alley. Our task is to usher in a shift of paradigms, a new foundation. via rferl.org

That is a threat that will make the Kremlin take notice, but it contradicts what he says above.  Certainly propping up totalitarianism has worked for Russia as it hide behind a facade of Democracy.  What ever mean spirited chess game Russia has done in the last 20 years has worked for them, but Kasparov obviously sees resource rich Asian states turning on "colonial" Russia out of greed as well. 

Putin must feel consequences.

Without Russia’s technical assistance, Iran wouldn’t be even close to a nuclear bomb, 

At the end of the day, selling nuclear technology to Iran, selling anti-missile defense systems, brings cash. And if America or Israel, or both, at a certain point attack Iran, the oil price goes up, so for Putin it’s a win-win situation.

Unfortunately, it seems the [US] administration is ready to attack Goldman Sachs, but it is not ready to attack Putin’s financial interests. Which means that Iran feels safe. 

...meanwhile Putin sees the chessworld as his key to power.
via jpost.com

Former world chess champion Anatoly Karpov has never been much of a rabble-rouser. During the Cold War he was a loyal Soviet subject whose chess anthologies featured pictures of him harvesting wheat with a scythe -- for fun. He flirted with elected office in the 1990s, but has confined his public activism in the Vladimir Putin era largely to ecological and children's causes. He speaks in a gentle, nasal voice. He collects stamps. 

But Karpov, whose battles with Garry Kasparov in the 1980s defined the
game of kings for an era, is now at the epicenter of an escalating political
imbroglio spreading through the already fractious world of international
chess.

With the backing of his former nemesis Kasparov and national federations from the United States and Western Europe, Karpov is bidding to unseat Kirsan Ilyumzhinov as the president of the International Chess Federation, known by its French acronym, FIDE. Ilyumzhinov is also the mercurial president of the southern Russian republic of Kalmykia, which he runs as his own fiefdom. His tumultuous 15-year reign over world chess has seen a precipitous decline in the prestige of the title of World Chess Champion.  More than chess is at stake. Winning re-election could be crucial for Ilyumzhinov, whose fate as the president of Kalmykia is up in the air. Ilyumzhinov has run his quasi-autonomous, mostly Buddhist republic since shortly after the fall of the Soviet Union, but is facing increasing criticism from the local opposition over persistent poverty in the region. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev will have to decide whether to nominate him for another term this fall.
"Even if he's not nominated for a new term, [the FIDE presidency] would allow him to remain a flashy, notable person of status," says Nikolai Petrov, an expert on regional Russian politics at the Carnegie Moscow Center.  Karpov, meanwhile, is promising to restore some of the international attention chess enjoyed for most of the last century. "The value of the title of world champion has been degraded, and the popularity isn't there," Karpov said in an interview last week. "No one knows who the world champion is
anymore." (That would be Indian grandmaster Viswanathan Anand, for those keeping score at home.) But a funny thing happened on Karpov's road to the FIDE presidential
election: The Kremlin's point man for chess snubbed him, declaring instead that
Ilyumzhinov will be Russia's candidate for the post. The decision puts the
government in the peculiar position of supporting a deeply eccentric, autocratic regional leader -- Ilyumzhinov claims to have once been briefly abducted by aliens and counts Muammar al-Qaddafi and Chuck Norris among his friends -- over one of Russia's greatest, and most politically loyal, sporting icons.   Why, exactly, is unclear, but the decision has prompted a revolt in the Russian Chess Federation. When the federation's supervisory council convened Friday in the ornate main playing hall of Moscow's Central Chess Club, a majority voted to nominate Karpov. But the meeting was subsequently declared "illegitimate" by Arkady Dvorkovich, the senior Kremlin aide who oversees the federation. Should Dvorkovich's decision stand, Karpov might end up running as a nominee from a European or North American federation. The geopolitical overtones of all this are a throwback, however faint, to chess's Cold War glory days, when the game was as inextricable from matters of national pride and identity as the Olympics. In the West, Bobby Fischer's victory over Boris Spassky in the 1972 World Chess Championship was portrayed as a triumph of American individualism and self-discipline over the collectivism and powerful state sponsorship of the Soviet chess machine. Millions of Americans
followed televised analysis of the intricate on-board maneuvering between the
two grandmasters, inspiring a brief national infatuation with chess. The 1984-1985
Kasparov-Karpov duels were eerily symbolic of the perestroika era, with the young, rebellious Kasparov surviving a grueling series of games to eventually trump Karpov and the fading Soviet hierarchy that supported him.

via foreignpolicy.com

“If you believe that the Iranian nuclear bomb is an imminent threat, not only to Israel but also to the interests of the United States and the Western world, you act,” he said. “If you don’t believe it, you can find thousands of excuses [not to act] – as the Western powers found 75 years ago when not acting against the rise of Nazi Germany.  “Putin’s threat is probably not comparable to the one in the 1930s,” he clarified, “but to a certain degree it will have a very serious impact on the Western system, because the No. 1 Russian export is not oil. It’s corruption. And Putin has found great demand for this product in the West.”  Asked whether issuing such outspoken criticisms placed him at personal risk, Kasparov noted that “I have bodyguards in Moscow.” He added, however: “In Russia, if the state goes after you, nothing helps.”  And questioned as to whether he might try again to seek the Russian presidency, he responded: “In Russia we’re not fighting to win elections, we’re trying to have elections. Our fight is very different... because we do not live in a democratic country. This,” he said, “is something that people in the West and also in Israel don’t want to recognize.”

via jpost.com