U.S. Faces Choice on New Weapons for Fast Strikes - NYTimes.com

Labels:
obviously the NYTimes is trying to promote that Obama isn't a woosie, but it was Bush's idea and there is no reason that Obama has to ask for Russia and China's permission.  
In coming years, President Obama will decide whether to deploy a new class of weapons capable of reaching any corner of the earth from the United States in under an hour and with such accuracy and force that they would greatly diminish America’s reliance on its nuclear arsenal.
Yet even now, concerns about the technology are so strong that the Obama administration has acceded to a demand by Russia that the United States decommission one nuclear missile for every one of these conventional weapons fielded by the Pentagon. That provision, the White House said, is buried deep inside the New Start treaty that Mr. Obama and President Dmitri A. Medvedev signed in Prague two weeks ago.
Called Prompt Global Strike, the new weapon is designed to carry out tasks like picking off Osama bin Laden in a cave, if the right one could be found; taking out a North Korean missile while it is being rolled to the launch pad; or destroying an Iranian nuclear site — all without crossing the nuclear threshold. In theory, the weapon will hurl a conventional warhead of enormous weight at high speed and with pinpoint accuracy, generating the localized destructive power of a nuclear warhead.

Culture of Goldman Sachs

Labels: » » »


Our Government was put in by the people who they are prosecuting. Are you so naive that you think they will get anything but a patsy?

Hillary pushes for Diplomacy as Syria also builds Nukes

Labels: » » »
This just shows how hostile Obama is to Western interests. Iran is not the only renegade terrorist state trying to achieve a nuclear arsenal... but instead of speaking softly and holding a big stick, we are speaking with our pinky finger in our mouth and bending over.
Clinton, speaking at a news conference before the opening of a NATO foreign ministers meeting in this Baltic capital, said the administration has concluded that the benefits of sending a US ambassador to Damascus — after a five-year absence — outweigh the costs.  via jpost.com  
For nearly two years, Syria has refused to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency’s investigation of a suspected nuclear reactor that was destroyed by Israel in September 2007.  Now the IAEA may request a rare “special inspection” of Syrian sites, making the country’s nuclear defiance the international community’s main point of contention with Damascus -- eclipsing even the investigation into Syrian officials’ involvement in the assassination of former Lebanese Premier Rafik Hariri.
via foreignaffairs.com
Does anyone seriously think that the US--or the West in general--will be any more effective in stopping Syria's nuclear program than they have been in controlling Iran's? Syria has been playing the West longer than Iran has, and the very fact that the US is considering sending an ambassador to the country that assassinated Hariri and recently provided Scuds to Hizbollah, shows that Syria is still at the top of its game.
via daledamos.blogspot.com
 
the Obama Administration sees a potential friend?
The Obama administration is still committed to improving relations with Syria despite its "deeply troubling" moves to aid Hizbullah in neighboring Lebanon, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday.
Lee Smith, author of The Strong Horse: Power, Politics, and the Clash of Arab Civilizations writes in an article for Tablet that Syria
occupies a unique position in U.S. policymaking circles: Syria kills Americans and our allies, but its strategic significance pales in comparison to China, Russia, and Iran, which makes it a second- or even third-tier issue.

Popular Analysis