Web Jihad - Hudson New York

the answer my friends is that violence is not protected by the first Amendment. Earth to the facebook Administration!

Voltaire said, “I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” This is clearly one of the founding values of our civilization -- but what should one do when extending this right to people who are trying to destroy us means transforming freedom of expression into a suicide pact?

the attempted attack on Northwest Flight 253, by young Nigerian terrorist Umar Farooq Abdulmutallab, attention turned towards the American born Sheikh Anwar Al-Awlaki, presently hiding in Yemen, and the same Sheikh who instructed Major Nidal Hasan, to commit the Fort Hood killings.

via hudsonny.org

facebook speech absolutes?

Do yourself a favor before you talk in absolutes concerning free speech on a network that claims it has codes on conduct. Install the graffiti wall application and draw a nice picture of Hillary Clinton in a pant suit getting sodomized by an Asian guy. then alert all your left wing feminist friends and see how fast your account disappears. for an example of the type of accounts that facebook has refused to delete

http://video.seesmic.com/videos/S4zsTmT2Ur Barry Chuckle "i hope theres jews on that plane when it blows up"

it is very sad that people spend so much time on a social network without checking the terms. facebook has a policy already of censorship. I'm not asking for censorship of twitter that has no such policy. bias against Jews here is disturbing if you are already aware of the terms. obviously a private company is capable of doing as they please. that is not the issue. the issue is that facebook has terms that they ask us to uphold and they selectively enforce for example pornography or hostility towards women, but further the causes of Nazis. if facebook wants to enforce such rules as no nudity or Gloria Steinem rhetoric then they are already creating a code of conduct. this is merely enabling hate speech towards Jews arbitrarily. it is orchestrated prejudice. check the facebook terms if you don't believe me. there is also the matter of anti trust considering the size of facebook it infringes on the public.

For those that question my free speech credentials... I spent much time at Carnegie Mellon University petitioning the college to not censor the internet of pornography in 1994 and the activities of myself and our organization made the Village Voice, Time Magazine, Newsweek as well as the NYTimes. I have newspaper photos and clippings of the event against Martin Rimm from the year. look up Martin Rimm on the internet. It was myself who petitioned the college and designed all the signs. I'm not asking for censorship.... I'm against arbitrary enforcement of terms. that is a very different thing.

...and speaking of arbitrary terms. facebook employees use fake names. just thought you should know that as well. many activists against hate crimes on the internet also use fake names and facebook went out of their way to destroy their accounts and left up Barry Chuckle. Barry Chuckle is obviously not a real name. they ask any Jew online if their name is real, but any NAZI they leave alone. This is selective prejudice. very simple. this is just more Obama culture... and we are going to throw these people out of power. not just in government, but in social media.

Former Chief U.N. Weapons Inspector in Teen Sex Sting

Makes one wonder what Saddam offered this guy to be against the war? The chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 and harsh critic of the war in Iraq, Ritter is accused of contacting the 15 "girl" while using the handle "delmarm4fun" last February.

Ritter, 48, allegedly masturbated in front of a Web camera while he was engaged in conversation in an Internet chat room with an undercover cop posing as the teenage girl. He declined to discuss the charges Thursday when reporters visited his New York residence.

"I said there would be no comment," Ritter said, according to the Albany Times Union. "Why don't you guys just go away?"

• Click here to read the affidavit.

• Click here to read the criminal complaint.

The New York Post reported Ritter was caught in a similar case in April 2001 involving a 14-year-old girl, but he was never charged.

read the details via foxnews.com

Iran says nuclear scientist assassinated Zionist style

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

The Iranian president says a familiar assassination method practiced by Israel was seen in the recent assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist.

Addressing a gathering in the southern province of Khuzestan on Thursday, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that the enemy is trying to obstruct Iran's path to scientific success.

Iranian nuclear physics scientist Dr. Massoud Ali-Mohammadi was killed in a remote-controlled bomb attack in the Iranian capital on Tuesday.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry had earlier said that Iran had found traces of US and Israeli involvement in the assassination of Ali-Mohammadi.

"The style of bombing and assassination of the martyred Dr. Ali-Mohammadi was a Zionist one," said the Iranian president.

The president added that the enemy knows that a developed Iran would culturally and not militarily conquer the world.

"They [the enemies] want to make sure that Iran does not advance," President Ahmadinejad said.

"The enemy cannot remove the knowledge from the Iranian nation by killing its elite," the president added.

via presstv.ir

so why not kill the rest of the program scientists? he's going to blame Israel no matter what.

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon's posterous

burden on small and medium sized business = NO JOBS

Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a burden on small and medium-sized businesses that could grow and create jobs.

In lamenting the lack of economic growth in the decade that just passed, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman had pointed the finger at a typical culprit: the supposed deregulation that occurred in the Bush administration. “As for the Republicans, now that their policies of tax cuts and deregulation have led us into an economic quagmire, their prescription for recovery is - tax cuts and deregulation.” Krugman called the 2000s “the decade in which we achieved nothing and learned nothing.”

the very same Paul Krugman who sees "humanity" in climategate... not liars.

Yet a glance at what really happened in the first decade of the new millennium shows that Krugman and others of his ilk are the ones who have really learned nothing. They continue to insist that the financial crisis was caused by deregulation even though so much government intervention in housing -- from the subsidies to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the reckless lending encouraged by Community Reinvestment Act - contributed to the mortgage meltdown.

And, as Rep. Ron Paul recently pointed out, “As for a lack of regulation, the last decade saw the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the largest piece of financial regulatory legislation” in decades.
Rushed through Congress and signed by President Bush in the wake of the Enron and WorldCom scandals in 2002, the law has quadrupled the costs of the audit process for public companies and achieved little tangible results in preventing fraud. Because of all the high-paying work it creates for auditors in helping firms comply with the law, Sarbox has been called “a boon for bean counters” (in Business Week) and the “Accountants Full Employment Act.”
Sarbox is a significant cost factor holding back job growth and a stronger recovery. If it is repealed or scaled back, the second decade of the new millennium could see real prosperity as American entrepreneurial energies are once again unleashed through the next Microsoft and Googles going public.
On top of this, Sarbanes-Oxley has achieved very little in preventing fraud. In 2007 Countrywide Financial Corp. was praised for its Sarbanes-Oxley controls by the Institute of Internal Auditors. Two years and many scandals later, its former executives have been charged with securities fraud. And certainly, overall transparency doesn’t increase when companies go private or delay going public, as many have chosen to do because of the law’s costs.

via hudsonny.org

So how do you keep companies like Enron from abuse? My opinion... more competition. If there is a near monopoly in energy for example then the government should break up the private company or make it easier for other "Enrons" to get out there. One private energy company going against the government is a system that is ripe for abuse. The same could be said about the healthcare industry that we are presently creating. A government industry with only one private alternative will always have people cheating and even cronyism between the government and it's private competitor.

Haiti Coverage and Pat Robertson Speaks, Shep Smith and Haitian Ambassador Respond, Aid Workers Cry

I'm also wondering if Al Gore will blame the Haitian Earthquake on Global Warming? Pat Robertson seems to think it could of been an act of g-d. Consider the rate of AIDS in Haiti... one could see a serious cause and effect. At least Robertson wasn't afraid to say something. I happen to not translate the bible exactly as I see it inspired as it says and sometimes a historical document which is always imperfect.. however. I do believe that a part of an island that is as plague ridden and natural disaster ridden as Haiti is, that something is certainly saying something.

It was pointed out to me by a person on my profile "you can blame the lack of preparedness on their broken economic system. Neighboring Dominican Republic should have been far better prepared for even this level of destruction, b/c they have the largest economy in Caribbean region."

I'd have to agree that there is a serious economic problem here, but is not economic action also a behavior? I see Robertson's point.

Pat Robertson on Haiti Disaster
by burghnews

via weaselzippers.net